2010
DOI: 10.4189/shes.8.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of mood state on the information processing of advertisement

Abstract: We examined the effects of mood on the information processing and on the multiple functions of advertisement. The first experiment hypothesized that positive mood promoted an automatic processing of information and negative mood promoted a controlled processing of information. Moods were induced by asking about happy (positive mood) or unhappy (negative mood) event. Next, participants were presented with the statement advertisement or image advertisement. The results showed that participants in negative mood e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total score on this questionnaire was 35 points, with smaller numbers reflecting a more positive emotional state and larger numbers reflecting a more negative emotional state. Cronbach's alpha as reported in Ohtomo et al (2010) was 0.91.…”
Section: Emotional State Questionnairementioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The total score on this questionnaire was 35 points, with smaller numbers reflecting a more positive emotional state and larger numbers reflecting a more negative emotional state. Cronbach's alpha as reported in Ohtomo et al (2010) was 0.91.…”
Section: Emotional State Questionnairementioning
confidence: 88%
“…We then conducted a second assessment of the participant's current emotional state with the same questionnaire as before (Ohtomo et al, 2010). We then had all participants undergo the same stop-distance method for third and fourth measurements of personal space, consisting of the two face conditions (i.e., masked and unmasked), again with face conditions counterbalanced in their order across participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation