1990
DOI: 10.4141/cjas90-032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Moist Heat and Ammonia on the Chemical Composition and Feeding Value of Extruded Canola Screenings for Mice

Abstract: . 1990. The effects of moist heat and ammonra on the chemical composition and feeding value of extruded canola screenings for mice. Can. J' Anim. Sci. 70 [267][268][269][270][271][272][273][274][275][276][277] Canola screenings were exposed to moist heat and ammonia during extrusion. The extruded canolaicreenings (ECS) were then analyzed for chemical components and used in feeding trials to asiess their value as a protein and energy supplement' Extruded canola screenings were incorporated into diets at 8 .2, 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with canola/rapeseed fines evaluated in other studies, where weed seeds averaged 40% ) and inorganic matter (soil and sand) was up to 40% of the screenings (Bell and Shires 1980), the CS used in the present study had less of such contaminants and were similar to those used by (Darroch et al 1990) and (Keith and Bell 1983). The CP, crude fat and fibre contents of coarse canola screenings available from the commercial plant varied over the course of a year (Table 1), but such variability would not preclude utilisation of CS in diets for ruminants.…”
Section: Composition Of Canola Screeningsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with canola/rapeseed fines evaluated in other studies, where weed seeds averaged 40% ) and inorganic matter (soil and sand) was up to 40% of the screenings (Bell and Shires 1980), the CS used in the present study had less of such contaminants and were similar to those used by (Darroch et al 1990) and (Keith and Bell 1983). The CP, crude fat and fibre contents of coarse canola screenings available from the commercial plant varied over the course of a year (Table 1), but such variability would not preclude utilisation of CS in diets for ruminants.…”
Section: Composition Of Canola Screeningsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The presence of anti-nutritional factors may also have influenced N retention, but confirmation of this would require specific address in further studies. Canola has been selected to be low in glucosinolates, but the seeds of weeds such as stinkweed and wild mustard, which may be prevalent in CS (Keith and Bell 1983;Darroch et al 1990), contain high levels of glucosinolates (7 to 8%, Beames et al 1986). The variety of weed seeds present in CS (Bell and Shires 1980) increases the likelihood of other anti-nutritional factors, such as alkaloids, being present.…”
Section: Digestibility Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extrusion alone is likely to have little effect on retention of glucosinolates (Fenwick et al, 1986). Total glucosinolates in canola meal were reduced by added ammonia during extrusion (Darroch et al, 1990). Although extrusion with ammonium carbonate did not completely destroy glucosinolates in rapeseed meal, the process did improve nutritional parameters in rats fed with the extruded vs. unprocessed rapeseed meal (Barrett et al, 1997).…”
Section: Glucosinolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1986). Total glucosinolates in canola meal were reduced by added ammonia during extrusion (Darroch et al. , 1990).…”
Section: Nutritional Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has focused on reactive extrusion to enhance the effects of extrusion on toxins. Adding ammonia reduced aflatoxins in peanut meal (2) and total glucosinolates in extruded canola (3), but this remedy may not be suitable for human foods. Selection of an effective chemical agent with low toxicity and possible nutritional benefits is desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%