2015
DOI: 10.2174/2210676605666150311222928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Sleep Disturbance: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is rising interest in mindfulness in the health literature because an increasing number of studies indicate that being mindful has salutary effects on psychological (e.g., Chiesa and Serretti 2009;Vollestad et al 2012) and physical health (e.g., Davidson et al 2003;Reibel et al 2001). More relevant to the present research, a number of correlational (e.g., Howell et al 2010Howell et al , 2008 and mindfulness-based intervention studies (e.g., Kanen et al 2015) indicate that being mindful leads to better sleep quality and longer sleep duration. This is presumably because mindfulness allows for a more observant and accepting approach to sleep-interfering arousal processes which promotes better sleep at night (Lundh 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There is rising interest in mindfulness in the health literature because an increasing number of studies indicate that being mindful has salutary effects on psychological (e.g., Chiesa and Serretti 2009;Vollestad et al 2012) and physical health (e.g., Davidson et al 2003;Reibel et al 2001). More relevant to the present research, a number of correlational (e.g., Howell et al 2010Howell et al , 2008 and mindfulness-based intervention studies (e.g., Kanen et al 2015) indicate that being mindful leads to better sleep quality and longer sleep duration. This is presumably because mindfulness allows for a more observant and accepting approach to sleep-interfering arousal processes which promotes better sleep at night (Lundh 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This suggests that the term CBT‐I is used as a convenient label but that treatment could include different evidence‐based psychological interventions, such as motivational and emotional strategies, which are currently less well defined or standardized. Recently, other psychotherapeutic approaches, such as mindfulness and hypnotherapy, centring on powering emotion‐regulation skills, have been empirically investigated (Gong et al, ; Kanen, Nazir, Sedky, & Pradhan, ; Lam et al, ) and acceptance and commitment therapy has been proposed as a possible intervention for non‐responders to CBT‐I (Hertenstein et al, ). Together with the main strategies listed in Table , knowledge on sleeping medication tapering or withdrawal should be considered a component of CBT‐I.…”
Section: The Cbt‐i Academymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the term CBT-I is used as a convenient label but that treatment could include different evidence-based psychological interventions, such as motivational and emotional strategies, which are currently less well defined or standardized. Recently, other psychotherapeutic approaches, such as mindfulness and hypnotherapy, centring on powering emotion-regulation skills, have been empirically investigated (Gong et al, 2016;Kanen, Nazir, Sedky, & Pradhan, 2015;Lam et al, 2015) and…”
Section: Ingredients Of Cbt-imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, findings were inconsistent and ranged from no effect to a moderate positive effect in favor of mindfulness meditation. Two of the four meta‐analyses were not restricted to randomized control trials (RCTs) . A third meta‐analysis restricted its investigation to RCTs; however, owing to the small number of included trials, investigators were unable to analyze the active control and waitlist control trials separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the four meta-analyses were not restricted to randomized control trials (RCTs). 20,21 A third meta-analysis restricted its investigation to RCTs; 22 however, owing to the small number of included trials, investigators were unable to analyze the active control and waitlist control trials separately. This made it difficult to parse nonspecific effects (e.g., attention and expectancy bias) from the effect of the intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%