1985
DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(85)90392-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of methyl mercury binding to microtubules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been regarded as the cause of the increased frequency of polyploidy and aneuploidy in Allium and Drosophila (Ramel & Magnusson 1969, 1979, Fiskesjo 1988. Moreover, in vitro polymerization and depolymerization of microtubules is affected by MeHg (Vogel et al 1985). This could explain some of the multiple effects of MeHg on the cell cycle, including a lengthened G1 and decreased transition probability after short term exposure of cycling cells, and a G2 accumulation after a longer term exposure (Vogel et al 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This has been regarded as the cause of the increased frequency of polyploidy and aneuploidy in Allium and Drosophila (Ramel & Magnusson 1969, 1979, Fiskesjo 1988. Moreover, in vitro polymerization and depolymerization of microtubules is affected by MeHg (Vogel et al 1985). This could explain some of the multiple effects of MeHg on the cell cycle, including a lengthened G1 and decreased transition probability after short term exposure of cycling cells, and a G2 accumulation after a longer term exposure (Vogel et al 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The arresting of the G2/Mphase because of microtubules being disrupted may be an important factor in MeHg leading to apoptosis . MeHg has long been known to be a potent inhibitor of microtubule polymerization, and this effect is presumably caused by the S-mercuration of the microtubules by MeHg (Abe et al, 1975;Sager et al, 1983;Vogel et al, 1985Vogel et al, , 1989. Vogel et al (1989) found that there is a class of binding sites that have high affinities for MeHg on tubulin and that MeHg binds to tubulin stoichiometrically within microtubules.…”
Section: The Disruption Of Microtubules and S-mercurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, MeHg has been shown to possess high affinity for tubulin sulfhydryl groups (Vogel et al, 1985), to depolymerize cerebral microtubules in vitro (Abe et al, 1975) and to directly inhibit in vitro microtubule assembly (Sager et al, 1983). Moreover, MeHg has been reported to promote microtubule disruption in several cell models, including human fibroblasts (Sager et al, 1983), mouse splenic lymphocytes (Roy et al, 1991), neuroblastoma (Prasad et al, 1979), glioma cells (Prasad et al, 1979;Miura et al, 1984) and embryonal carcinoma cells Wasteneys et al, 1988;Graff et al, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%