1956
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(56)90674-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of maternal narcotic addiction on the newborn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1957
1957
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A pa¬ tient last seen at 17 months had clumsy, asymmetrical hand use, toe stance, and slight delay of gross mo¬ tor development. A (4) Follow-up of the in¬ fant is dependent upon the coopera¬ tion of the addict parent or, more commonly, cooperation of the rela¬ tives or court-appointed foster par¬ ents raising the child. The period of "subacute with¬ drawal" symptoms has been impres¬ sive for several reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pa¬ tient last seen at 17 months had clumsy, asymmetrical hand use, toe stance, and slight delay of gross mo¬ tor development. A (4) Follow-up of the in¬ fant is dependent upon the coopera¬ tion of the addict parent or, more commonly, cooperation of the rela¬ tives or court-appointed foster par¬ ents raising the child. The period of "subacute with¬ drawal" symptoms has been impres¬ sive for several reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growth in the occurrence of morphine and heroin habit among females was prominent as early as about 100 years ago (4); but, newborns were not believed to be exposed as it was supposed that morphine use amongst females was related to infertility and damage of erotic desire. That misconception modified since the initial described event in a neonate about 1987 (5,6) who displayed signs of opioid withdrawal at delivery, identified by means of inherited morphinism. After that, augmented reports of congenital morphinism caused an important consideration in the view of obstetricians and pediatricians (6,7).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That misconception modified since the initial described event in a neonate about 1987 (5,6) who displayed signs of opioid withdrawal at delivery, identified by means of inherited morphinism. After that, augmented reports of congenital morphinism caused an important consideration in the view of obstetricians and pediatricians (6,7). Inherited morphinism was situated afterward retitled in place of abstinence syndrome in neonates.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the attention of the medical profession was drawn particularly by Perlstein (1947) when he reported neonatal narcotic addiction as a cause of seizures. Since that time, there have been many reports of fetal narcotic addic tion (Cobrinik, 1956;Cobrinik et al, 1959\Dikshit, 1961Goodfriend et al, 1956;Hill and Desmond, 1963;Kahn et al, 1969;Krause et al, 1958;Kunstadter et al, 1958;Perlmutter, 1947;Perlstein, 1947;Roman and Middlekamp, 1958;Rosenthal et al, 1965, Schneck, 1958Slobody and Cobrinik, 1971 ;Steg, 1957;Zelson, 1973), including that of Claman and Strang (1962) from Canada. 75-85 % of the babies born of addicted mothers show drug withdrawal symptoms [Zelson, 1973).…”
Section: Withdrawal Symptoms Opiatesmentioning
confidence: 99%