2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of magnetic-field geometry on longitudinal oscillations of solar prominences: Cross-sectional area variation for thin tubes

Abstract: Context. Solar prominences are subject to both field-aligned (longitudinal) and transverse oscillatory motions, as evidenced by an increasing number of observations. Large-amplitude longitudinal motions provide valuable information on the geometry of the filamentchannel magnetic structure that supports the cool prominence plasma against gravity. Our pendulum model, in which the restoring force is the gravity projected along the dipped field lines of the magnetic structure, best explains these oscillations. How… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luna et al (2016b) found that the oscillations are dependent chiefly on the radius of curvature of the magnetic field and not other details of the field line geometry. Luna et al (2016a) found that there is no coupling between longitudinal motion and transverse motions in 2D numerical simulations. All these results indicate the robustness of the pendulum model for explanation and analysis of LALOs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Luna et al (2016b) found that the oscillations are dependent chiefly on the radius of curvature of the magnetic field and not other details of the field line geometry. Luna et al (2016a) found that there is no coupling between longitudinal motion and transverse motions in 2D numerical simulations. All these results indicate the robustness of the pendulum model for explanation and analysis of LALOs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus, we find that that the periodicities in the system we analyze range from 54 ± 1 to 69 ± 2 minutes. According to the model of ; ; Luna et al (2016a), the period of the longitudinal fundamental mode is determined by the relation…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Prominence Deduced From Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement found between the numerical results and the Luna and Karpen (2012) theoretical model provides with a tool to determine the curvature radius of the magnetic field lines and, therefore, to perform filament seismology. On the other hand, Luna et al (2016a) have studied the influence of cross-sectional area variations along a flux tube, which contains a prominence thread and is surrounded by the hot corona, on the longitudinal oscillations. These authors have found that these variations do not affect in a significant way to the oscillations, which validates the pendulum model (Luna and Karpen 2012;Luna et al 2012a).…”
Section: Longitudinal Oscillationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is in progress and is addressed in part II as a continuation of the present paper part I. Another future improvement to the model is the implementation of the variation of the cross-sectional area along the tube, allowing us to incorporate a truly 3D effect in the calculation of the equilibrium and the corresponding eigenfrequencies (see Luna et al 2016a). An et al (1988) and Wu et al (1990) investigated the effects of plasma injection on the formation of the Kippenhahn-Schlüter model of prominence in optimum conditions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%