The effects of low tidal ventilation on lung strain correlate with respiratory system compliance

Abstract

BackgroundThe effect of alterations in tidal volume on mortality of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is determined by respiratory system compliance. We aimed to investigate the effects of different tidal volumes on lung strain in ARDS patients who had various levels of respiratory system compliance.MethodsNineteen patients were divided into high (Chigh group) and low (Clow group) respiratory system compliance groups based on their respiratory system compliance values. We defined compliance ≥0.6 ml/(cmH2O/kg) as Chigh and compliance <0.6 ml/(cmH2O/kg) as Clow. End-expiratory lung volumes (EELV) at various tidal volumes were measured by nitrogen wash-in/washout. Lung strain was calculated as the ratio between tidal volume and EELV. The primary outcome was that lung strain is a function of tidal volume in patients with various levels of respiratory system compliance.ResultsThe mean baseline EELV, strain and respiratory system compliance values were 1873 ml, 0.31 and 0.65 ml/(cmH2O/kg), respectively; differences in all of these parameters were statistically significant between the two groups. For all participants, a positive correlation was found between the respiratory system compliance and EELV (R = 0.488, p = 0.034). Driving pressure and strain increased together as the tidal volume increased from 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) to 12 ml/kg PBW. Compared to the Chigh ARDS patients, the driving pressure was significantly higher in the Clow patients at each tidal volume. Similar effects of lung strain were found for tidal volumes of 6 and 8 ml/kg PBW. The “lung injury” limits for driving pressure and lung strain were much easier to exceed with increases in the tidal volume in Clow patients.ConclusionsRespiratory system compliance affected the relationships between tidal volume and driving pressure and lung strain in ARDS patients. These results showed that increasing tidal volume induced lung injury more easily in patients with low respiratory system compliance.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01864668, Registered 21 May 2013.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1600-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

What links ventilator driving pressure with survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome? A computational study

“…In 2015, Amato and colleagues [12] presented the results of a retrospective analysis of individual patient data, with the conclusion that the driving pressure (tidal volume normalized to lung compliance) was better associated to survival in ARDS patients than either tidal volume or plateau pressure separately. Following this, various studies have corroborated those results [13, 35], and shown that driving pressure was a good indicator of lung stress [36], higher driving pressures were associated with more postoperative pulmonary complications [35], and higher driving pressures may induce lung injury more easily in patients with low respiratory system compliance [37]. The results in this paper support the hypothesis that higher driving pressure results in increases in several important indices of VILI.…”

Tidal Volume Lowering by Instrumental Dead Space Reduction in Brain-Injured ARDS Patients: Effects on Respiratory Mechanics, Gas Exchange, and Cerebral Hemodynamics

“…In our study, the use of low V T leads to a significant increase in static C RS without affecting the linear compliance measured between lower and upper inflection point. Lung volume, as defined by Rec, did not change nor patients' position varied among the study steps, and chest wall elastance was likely constant over the entire course of the study, thus suggesting that any observed change in respiratory mechanics reflects variations in lung mechanics: In particular, the results inhering static and quasi-static compliance indicate some degree of lung overdistention when higher V T were used, as already suggested by other authors [20,49,50].…”

A narrative review of driving pressure as a monitoring indicator during mechanical ventilation with spontaneous breathing

“…More importantly, the compliance and functional residual capacity of the baby lung are proportional (23), and VILI is related to its excessive stress and strain. To prevent VILI, we must limit VT based on the functional residual capacity of the baby's lungs rather than the ideal weight (24)(25)(26). Recently, Amato et al reported that the Crs-standardized VT was a better predictor of prognosis in patients with ARDS than VT alone.…”