2008
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-4522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects Of Local Environmental Institutions On Perceptions Of Smoke And Fire Problems In Brazil

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have studied environmental governance from a variety of perspectives including theoretical and empirical perspectives. In the empirical approach which this paper follows, there is increasing acknowledgement of the importance of measuring governance quantitatively (Dasgupta et al 1995;Coglianese and Nash 2001;Miles 2002;Wang and Di 2002;Kaufmann and Kraay 2007;Steiner et al 2003;Durant et al 2004;Braga and Irina 2004;Wertz-Kanounnikoff and Chomitz 2008). All of these authors have one time or the other, applied a quantitative approach or sought to reduce aspects of governance and more specifically environmental governance to measurable phenomenon.…”
Section: Conceptualising Environmental Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have studied environmental governance from a variety of perspectives including theoretical and empirical perspectives. In the empirical approach which this paper follows, there is increasing acknowledgement of the importance of measuring governance quantitatively (Dasgupta et al 1995;Coglianese and Nash 2001;Miles 2002;Wang and Di 2002;Kaufmann and Kraay 2007;Steiner et al 2003;Durant et al 2004;Braga and Irina 2004;Wertz-Kanounnikoff and Chomitz 2008). All of these authors have one time or the other, applied a quantitative approach or sought to reduce aspects of governance and more specifically environmental governance to measurable phenomenon.…”
Section: Conceptualising Environmental Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each one may be regarded as optimal Source: Wertz-Kanounnikoff and Rojat (2007 However, there is generally scope for converting one form of capital into another.…”
Section: Rnrm: Three Typical Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%