1975
DOI: 10.1016/0300-9629(75)90422-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of litter size on the bioenergetics and water requirements of lactating Mus musculus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…data). All breeding mice have greatly increased demands for energy, protein and water, and when these resources are available ad libitum (as in laboratory conditions) they can allocate them directly to increasing litter size (Smith & McManus 1975;Studier 1979); but mice in field populations are usually fully exploiting the available resources, so must accommodate the additional demands of reproduction primarily by reallocation of resources from other functions . Therefore, it might be hypothesised that nutritional differences, shown in this study to dramatically affect juvenile growth rates, would also influence the number of females able to breed, their litter sizes and their ability to nurse young, and hence weaning success and body mass of weanlings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data). All breeding mice have greatly increased demands for energy, protein and water, and when these resources are available ad libitum (as in laboratory conditions) they can allocate them directly to increasing litter size (Smith & McManus 1975;Studier 1979); but mice in field populations are usually fully exploiting the available resources, so must accommodate the additional demands of reproduction primarily by reallocation of resources from other functions . Therefore, it might be hypothesised that nutritional differences, shown in this study to dramatically affect juvenile growth rates, would also influence the number of females able to breed, their litter sizes and their ability to nurse young, and hence weaning success and body mass of weanlings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graham, 1964;Kaczmarski, 1966;Migula, 1969;Stebbins, 1977;Randolph et al 1977;Millar, 1978;Mattingly and McClure, 1982;Sadleir, 1982;Glazier, 1985«, b). These levels may vary directly with litter size {e.g., Smith and McManus, 1975;Millar, 1978;Sadleir, 1982) and may be over 200% in digestively inefficient species {e.g., the folivorous "carnivore," the red panda, Ailurus fulgens: Gittleman, 1988è; see also Studier, 1979). Peak levels of energy use may approach 2.5-5 times those of non-reproductive females (see ref-erences above).…”
Section: Lactationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak levels of energy use may approach 2.5-5 times those of non-reproductive females (see ref-erences above). However, despite high energy expenditures during lactation, net production ranges from about 15-45% (see Smith and McManus, 1975;Mattingly and McClure, 1982;Glazier, 1985è;Oftedal, 1985) which is similar to, or even slightly higher than, gestation.…”
Section: Lactationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other species, as mentioned above, such changes have been explained in terms of variation in birth weight, litter size, maternal metabolic capacity or combinations of these factors (e.g. SMITH & MCMANUS 1975;MILLAR 1978;MATTINGLEY & MCCLURE 1982;SADLEIR 1982). A further factor which may explain the degree of food increase during lactation across species is digestive efficiency.…”
Section: Comparative Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%