2017
DOI: 10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Learning Activities Based on Argumentation on Conceptual Understanding of 7th Graders about “Force and Motion” Unit and Establishing Thinking Friendly Classroom Environment

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of learning activities based on argumentation about "Force and Motion" unit on conceptual understanding and views about establishing thinking friendly classroom environment of 7th graders. The study was conducted with total 39 students (20 students in experimental group and 19 students in control group) in a secondary school. The experimental group received learning activities based on argumentation while the control group received regular science learni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Table 6 in the experimental class show that rebuttal gets the highest results in N-Gain, this is because rebuttal does not need other claims, only rebuttals are found in the findings, so the refutation does not require complicated systematics. This is in line with research conducted by previous research, which states that rebuttal does not require a high series of complexities because rebuttal only focuses on refutation based on previously built claims (Buber & Coban, 2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Based on Table 6 in the experimental class show that rebuttal gets the highest results in N-Gain, this is because rebuttal does not need other claims, only rebuttals are found in the findings, so the refutation does not require complicated systematics. This is in line with research conducted by previous research, which states that rebuttal does not require a high series of complexities because rebuttal only focuses on refutation based on previously built claims (Buber & Coban, 2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Learning in control classes was not active, because it used conventional media that was traditional. So that students are not too interested (Buber & Coban, 2017;Lemus et al, 2014;Ningsih, Rusdi, & Miarsyah, 2019;Nugraini, Choo, Hin, & Hoon, 2013;Yousefi, 2014). Based on media appearance, conventional media also does not have a display that can be easily understood by students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faktanya, siswa menemui kesulitan dalam pemahaman terhadap konsep-konsep sains. Hal ini disebabkan oleh sifat dari konsep sains yang abstrak (Buber & Coban, 2017;Ozdemir, Coramik, & Urek, 2020) serta metode dan teknik pengajaran tidak cukup untuk mengajarkan konsep-konsep abstrak ini (Buber & Coban, 2017) karena kualitas proses pembelajaran yang diterapkan oleh seorang guru adalah salah satu faktor penting yang menentukan keberhasilan proses belajar siswa (Sukaesih & Sutrisno, 2016). Çepni, et al (dalam Tasoğlu & Bakaç, 2014 mengatakan bahwa selama ini, langkah-langkah pendekatan tradisional untuk pengajaran konsep antara lain: (a) memberi siswa kata yang mengekspresikan konsep, (b) menentukan definisi konsep dan mengidentifikasi serta membedakan kualitas yang diperlukan untuk memahami definisi, dan (c) memastikan bahwa siswa menemukan contoh yang terkait dan tidak terkait dengan konsep.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified