The Effects of Kinesio Tape on Chronic Low Back Pain Among Young Male Adults in Ampang

Norman, Wan Mohd Norsyam Wan; Nuar, Mohd Aimerul Mat; Sariman, Mohd Hanifa; Razak, Fatin Aqilah Abdul

doi:10.1007/978-981-13-0074-5_97

Cited by 3 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nine of the included studies analyzed the ETA effect on the TRM by RCT, 2 studies analyzed this by CCT. The external validity was guaranteed in 7 studies 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 50 , 51 while this was not guaranteed in 3 studies. 49 , 52 , 53 The internal validity was scored “excellent” in 6 studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“… Control set-up: CGr received 2 shams “I” paravertebral elastic tape with 0% tension. Within time: EGr: Baseline-W2: MD=–1.32±0.24; P <.05 EGr: Baseline-W4: MD=1.85±0.23; P <.05 CGr: Baseline-W2: MD=–0.61±0.20; P <.05 CGr: Baseline-W4: MD=–1.11±0.23; P <.05 - + - - Between groups: (Pair difference): Baseline-W2: Groups d: MD=–0.71; 95% CI=–-0.85 to –0.56; P <.05 EGr>CGr - Baseline-W4: Groups d: MD=–0.73; 95% CI=–0.88 to –0.58; P <.05 EGr > CGr - Norman et al 51 RCT, nonspecific chronic LBP 20 LBP Experimental set-up: The paravertebral muscle technique. Two I-strips (5 cm wide and ~20 cm long).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of these 277 articles, 267 articles were omitted owing to a lack of relevant information (eg, no ROM outcome, no ETA research, and/or ETA in combination with another intervention), resulting in 10 studies that met the requirements for methodological evaluation. 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 After the methodological evaluation, 2 studies did not meet our quality criteria of a score of ≤5 on the PEDro scale and had to be excluded, 52 , 53 which resulted in 8 articles that met the criteria for inclusion.

Fig 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart summarizing the yield of the search strategy and screen procedure.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 49 , 52 , 53 The internal validity was scored “excellent” in 6 studies. 44 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 50 Moreover, 2 studies were scored as “good,” 47 , 49 , 51 1 study was scored as “fair,” 53 and 1 study was scored as “poor.” 52 We excluded the last 2 studies from this review owing to their low quality because they might provide unmeaningful information concerning ETA effects on the TRM ( table 3 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some studies studied the effectiveness of ETA on the TRM in situ (condition 1), but others evaluated the effect after ETA was removed (condition 2). Two of the 8 studies evaluated condition 1, 48 , 49 3 of the 8 studies evaluated condition 2, 44 , 51 , 56 and 3 studies evaluated the effect of both conditions. 45 , 47 , 50 The characteristics of the 8 studies included in the systematic review are shown in table 4 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Systematic Review of Lumbar Elastic Tape on Trunk Mobility: A Debatable Issue

Amstel

Noten²,

Boomen³

et al. 2021

Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To systematically review the literature to analyze the effect of lumbar elastic tape application on trunk mobility, surpassing the minimal detectable change of the used outcome measurement tool, and to analyze the additional effect of applied tension and direction of elastic tape application in low back pain and participants without low back pain. Data Sources Four databases were used: PubMed, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Google Scholar. Study Selection The inclusion criteria were randomized and clinical controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of lumbar elastic tape application on trunk mobility. Data Extraction Two researchers executed the search and a third author was consulted to resolve disagreements. The methodological quality was scored using the PEDro scale, with studies scoring ≤5 being excluded. Data Synthesis Eight out of 6799 studies were included; 5 studied individuals with low back pain, and 3 studied participants without low back pain. Two studies scored low on the PEDro scale and were excluded. None of the reported significant changes in trunk mobility due to elastic tape application exceeded the indicated minimal detectable change. No conclusions can be drawn from the direction and applied tension of elastic tape application. Conclusions Based on the results of this systematic review, there is no evidence supporting the effect of lumbar elastic tape application. We recommend consensus in the use of more reliable and valid instruments in future studies.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fig 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart summarizing the yield of the search strategy and screen procedure.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Systematic Review of Lumbar Elastic Tape on Trunk Mobility: A Debatable Issue

Amstel

Noten²,

Boomen³

et al. 2021

Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization versus kinesiotape for chronic mechanical low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Grase,

M. Elhafez,

M. Abdellatif

et al. 2023

Physiother Quart.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe primary purpose was to compare the effect of conventional program, instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and kinesiotape (KT) in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP).Methods51 participants were randomly enrolled into three equal groups. Group A (n = 17) received conventional program, Group B (n = 17) received conventional program plus IASTM, and Group C (n = 17) received conventional program plus KT. The participants were evaluated before and after eight sessions using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pressure algometer, dual inclinometer, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).ResultsBetween pre-treatment and post-treatment, the three groups demonstrated a significant pain reduction (57.2%, 61.2%, and 57.77%; p < 0.0001), a significant increase in pain pressure threshold (PPT) [right (Rt): 56%, 53.2%, and 35.6%; left (Lt): 49%, 50.55%, and 41.36%; p < 0.0001], a significant improvement in the range of motion (ROM) (flexion: 38.59%, 43.55%, and 35.7%; extension: 72.4%, 88.73%, and 65.56%; Rt lateral flexion: 79.05%, 78.03%, and 55.42%; Lt lateral flexion: 85.33%, 96.37%, and 64.66%; Rt rotation 135%, 116.5%, and 188.48%; Lt rotation: 203%, 140.48%, and 224.24%; p < 0.0001), and a significant improvement in the functional disability index (56.8%, 49.55%, and 46.99%; p < 0.0001). No significant difference in pain, PPT, ROM and function was found among the three groups.ConclusionsConventional program, IASTM and KT are effective methods for improving pain, ROM and function on CMLBP.

show abstract

Effectiveness of Kinesio-Taping and Conventional Therapy for Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Tanveer,

Riaz,

Tanveer

et al. 2023

PJHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chronic non-specific low back pain, which is treated in orthopedic rehabilitation settings, is a frequent musculoskeletal issue. Lumbar spondylosis, Psychogenic Low Back Pain, Spinal Stenosis and poor posture are all causing pain for the patient. Kinesio-Taping helps to reduce or eliminate discomfort. Objective: To see how effective kinesio-tapping and traditional therapy are for non-specific chronic low back pain. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study design in which 30 patients were recruited using a convenient sampling sample, with 15 individuals in each group (Group A, Kinesio-Tapping with Conventional Therapy includes stretching, strengthening and hot pack) Group B which consists solely of standard conventional therapy. An independent T-Test for inter-group comparison and a paired sample T-Test for within-group analysis were used to assess the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability and Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Results: There was a significant change between the baseline and post-treatment NRPS values. Mean difference of 10.42 and 3.14 were reported between the pretreatment and post treatment values of NPRS in KT taping Group which was significant (p-value < 0.05). Mean difference of 14.18 and 3.68 were reported between the pretreatment and post treatment values of NPRS in Conventional PT Program Group which was significant (p-value < 0.05). Conclusions: Kinesio-Taping in conjunction with Conventional Therapy is more effective than Conventional Therapy alone in treating Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.

show abstract

The Effects of Kinesio Tape on Chronic Low Back Pain Among Young Male Adults in Ampang

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Systematic Review of Lumbar Elastic Tape on Trunk Mobility: A Debatable Issue

Systematic Review of Lumbar Elastic Tape on Trunk Mobility: A Debatable Issue

Effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization versus kinesiotape for chronic mechanical low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of Kinesio-Taping and Conventional Therapy for Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About