2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2003.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of Japanese foreign exchange market interventions on the yen/U.S. dollar exchange rate volatility

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
75
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors find that neither expected nor unexpected interventions have an impact on forecast heterogeneity between 1992 and 1994, while the estimated coefficients based on the period 1996 -2001 are statistically significant but ambiguously signed. Against the backdrop of the results presented in Menkhoff et al (2009) and studies of Bank of Japan reaction functions (Frenkel et al, 2005;Ito and Yabu, 2007) these findings may be due to an omitted variable problem, as current misalignment and recent returns of the exchange rate seem to be important not only for central bank intervention activity, but also for forecast heterogeneity. This paper investigates the determinants of forecast heterogeneity in the Yen-US dollar market by applying a large panel data set from Consensus Economics Inc. We consider a number of control variables such as the prevailing volatility regime as well as the risk premium at the foreign exchange market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The authors find that neither expected nor unexpected interventions have an impact on forecast heterogeneity between 1992 and 1994, while the estimated coefficients based on the period 1996 -2001 are statistically significant but ambiguously signed. Against the backdrop of the results presented in Menkhoff et al (2009) and studies of Bank of Japan reaction functions (Frenkel et al, 2005;Ito and Yabu, 2007) these findings may be due to an omitted variable problem, as current misalignment and recent returns of the exchange rate seem to be important not only for central bank intervention activity, but also for forecast heterogeneity. This paper investigates the determinants of forecast heterogeneity in the Yen-US dollar market by applying a large panel data set from Consensus Economics Inc. We consider a number of control variables such as the prevailing volatility regime as well as the risk premium at the foreign exchange market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…See, for example, Bonser-Neal and Tanner (1996), Dominguez (1998), Chaboud and LeBaron (2001), Galati, Melick and Micu (2002), Frenkel, Pierdzioch, and Stadtmann (2003) and Beine (2003). 20 The daily integrated volatilities were created by Steve Weinberg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite should be true for non-credible arrangements (Frenkel et al, 2005;Dominguez, 1998). However, the results regarding this issue are not clear-cut.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%