2016
DOI: 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v36n3p387-398/2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of irrigation management on floral induction of ‘Tommy Atkins' mango in bahia semiarid

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate reduction strategies of irrigation for proper management of floral induction and production of 'Tommy Atkins' mangoes, in the semiarid region of the Bahia state, Brazil. Five treatments with reduced irrigation levels based on crop evapotranspiration (ETc) were applied in two development stages, FI -flowering and FII -fruiting. Water depths were T1 -0% of ETc in FI and 100% in FII; T2 -25% of ETc in FI and 100% in FII; T3 -50% of ETc in FI and 100% in FII; T4 -75% of ETc in FI and 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For transpiration (E) at pre-flowering stage, T5 reached the highest rate (1.71 mmol de H 2 O m 2 s -1 ), 144% superior to that of T1, which was the lowest value recorded (Figure 1B). The results recorded for T3, T4 and T5 are similar to those reported by Faria et al (2016) in a study carried out with mango cv. Tommy Atkins in semi-arid region, a range of 1.23-2.87 mmol of H 2 O m 2 s -1 , as a function of irrigation management, and also similar to the results reported by Rymbai et al (2014), who evaluated the physiological indexes of mango cultivars in different agroclimatic regions of India and recorded values between 1.19 and 2.43 mmol of H 2 O m 2 s -1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For transpiration (E) at pre-flowering stage, T5 reached the highest rate (1.71 mmol de H 2 O m 2 s -1 ), 144% superior to that of T1, which was the lowest value recorded (Figure 1B). The results recorded for T3, T4 and T5 are similar to those reported by Faria et al (2016) in a study carried out with mango cv. Tommy Atkins in semi-arid region, a range of 1.23-2.87 mmol of H 2 O m 2 s -1 , as a function of irrigation management, and also similar to the results reported by Rymbai et al (2014), who evaluated the physiological indexes of mango cultivars in different agroclimatic regions of India and recorded values between 1.19 and 2.43 mmol of H 2 O m 2 s -1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding the water-use efficiency during the pre-flowering, T1 and T2 had the highest results, while T5 was the less efficient treatment (Figure 1C). Faria et al (2016) recorded a variation from 0.92 to 4.35 µmol of CO 2 /mmol of H 2 O in mango cv. Tommy Atkins growing in semi-arid environment, a broader range than the one recorded in this study where the results, even those found at the fullflowering, reached a mean of 3.17 mmol H 2 O L -1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The efficiency of mango floral induction through the use of growth regulators depends on controlling factors such as water availability and plant mineral nutrition (Ramírez and Davenport, 2010), which is favored in dry weather conditions. Studies in the semiarid region of northeastern Brazil have adapted floral induction techniques to irrigated crops (Mouco and Albuquerque, 2005) allowing the staggering of fruit production with off-season and two annual harvests, resulting in significant economic gains (Faria et al, 2016). The floral differentiation processes of mango trees are complex and involve both anatomical and physiological changes to the buds and leaves of the apical branches (Davenport, 2007;Ramírez and Davenport, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deleterious effect of high temperatures associated with low air relative humidity and water depth reduction causes high abiotic stress levels and consequently lower rates of photosynthesis, transpiration and leaf water potential (Faria et al, 2016). It demands different alleviating strategies, which can be highly advantageous for yield in subsequent growth seasons (Genú & Pinto, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%