2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of intraspecific hybridization on the host specificity of a weed biocontrol agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the parental strains that are crossed have similar host ranges hybridization does not necessarily alter the preference or performance of hybrids on suboptimal non-target species (Szűcs et al, 2021). Little is known of how intraspecific hybridization may influence host and climate adaptations in herbivorous insects used as biocontrol agents and without a better understanding of these basic processes, we cannot integrate evolutionary principles into biocontrol to improve the outcomes of programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when the parental strains that are crossed have similar host ranges hybridization does not necessarily alter the preference or performance of hybrids on suboptimal non-target species (Szűcs et al, 2021). Little is known of how intraspecific hybridization may influence host and climate adaptations in herbivorous insects used as biocontrol agents and without a better understanding of these basic processes, we cannot integrate evolutionary principles into biocontrol to improve the outcomes of programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the strains or species that are crossed have different host preferences the hybrids may exhibit specificity towards either of the parental host species and preference can change as hybridization progresses in later generations (Bitume et al., 2017; Hoffmann et al., 2002; Mathenge et al., 2010). However, when the parental strains that are crossed have similar host ranges hybridization does not necessarily alter the preference or performance of hybrids on suboptimal non‐target species (Szűcs et al., 2021). Little is known of how intraspecific hybridization may influence host and climate adaptations in herbivorous insects used as biocontrol agents and without a better understanding of these basic processes, we cannot integrate evolutionary principles into biocontrol to improve the outcomes of programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of multiple agent releases have been understudied, while the consequences of hybridization and admixture among divergent biocontrol agents are even less well understood (but see Szűcs et al, 2011;Szűcs et al, 2021). Biocontrol efforts could be enhanced if hybridization resulted in increased genetic diversity, providing the raw material for the regional evolution of more efficacious ecotypes, or increased fitness in populations with higher genetic diversity (Bean et al, 2013;Bitume et al, 2017;Szűcs et al, 2021;Szűcs, Eigenbrode, et al, 2012;Tracy & Robbins, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admixture among different populations, and, at an extreme, hybridization between different species, may present the genetic novelty and diversity necessary to overcome the bottleneck imposed by introduction and adapt, but at the risk of yielding undesirable traits or decreases in fitness (Fauvergue et al, 2012; Kolbe et al, 2004; Lommen et al, 2017; Rius & Darling, 2014). The outcomes of multiple agent releases have been understudied, while the consequences of hybridization and admixture among divergent biocontrol agents are even less well understood (but see Szűcs et al, 2011; Szűcs et al, 2012; Szűcs et al, 2012; Szűcs et al, 2021). Biocontrol efforts could be enhanced if hybridization resulted in increased genetic diversity, providing the raw material for the regional evolution of more efficacious ecotypes, or increased fitness in populations with higher genetic diversity (Bean et al, 2013; Bitume et al, 2017; Szűcs et al, 2021; Szűcs, Eigenbrode, et al, 2012; Szűcs, Schaffner, et al, 2012; Tracy & Robbins, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation