2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of intellectual functioning and autism severity on outcome of early behavioral intervention for children with autism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
102
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
102
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ED intervention involves multiple transitions per day from one activity or therapy to another which results in significant variation in the way intervention is provided. In ABA, teaching is more consistent, both in the methods used and in theHowever, only Ben-Itzchak and Zachor (2006) examine the correlation between pre-intervention cognitive ability and controlled intervention outcome. The researchers report that high IQ predicts better achievements only in receptive language skills but not in other investigated developmental domains after 1 year of intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ED intervention involves multiple transitions per day from one activity or therapy to another which results in significant variation in the way intervention is provided. In ABA, teaching is more consistent, both in the methods used and in theHowever, only Ben-Itzchak and Zachor (2006) examine the correlation between pre-intervention cognitive ability and controlled intervention outcome. The researchers report that high IQ predicts better achievements only in receptive language skills but not in other investigated developmental domains after 1 year of intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles by Harris and Handleman (2000) and Ben-Itzchak and Zachor (2006) have replicated the predictive power of initial IQ in terms of better outcomes. A second predictor of better outcomes may involve age at entry.…”
Section: Pretreatment Iqmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since the Eikeseth (2009) review, several additional outcome studies have been published; one has reached Level 2 scientific merit (Grindle et al 2012) and five studies have reached Level 3 scientific merit (Ben-Itzchak and Zachor 2007;Eldevik et al 2012;Hayward et al 2009;Peters-Scheffer et al 2010;Perry et al 2008). These studies report results similar to the ones reviewed in Eikeseth (2009).…”
Section: Eibimentioning
confidence: 99%