The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence

Abstract

BackgroundHealthcare systems around the world have been responding to the demand for better integrated models of service delivery. However, there is a need for further clarity regarding the effects of these new models of integration, and exploration regarding whether models introduced in other care systems may achieve similar outcomes in a UK national health service context.MethodsThe study aimed to carry out a systematic review of the effects of integration or co-ordination between healthcare services, or between health and social care on service delivery outcomes including effectiveness, efficiency and quality of care. Electronic databases including MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Science and Social Science Citation Indices; and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant literature published between 2006 to March 2017. Online sources were searched for UK grey literature, and citation searching, and manual reference list screening were also carried out. Quantitative primary studies and systematic reviews, reporting actual or perceived effects on service delivery following the introduction of models of integration or co-ordination, in healthcare or health and social care settings in developed countries were eligible for inclusion. Strength of evidence for each outcome reported was analysed and synthesised using a four point comparative rating system of stronger, weaker, inconsistent or limited evidence.ResultsOne hundred sixty seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Analysis indicated evidence of perceived improved quality of care, evidence of increased patient satisfaction, and evidence of improved access to care. Evidence was rated as either inconsistent or limited regarding all other outcomes reported, including system-wide impacts on primary care, secondary care, and health care costs. There were limited differences between outcomes reported by UK and international studies, and overall the literature had a limited consideration of effects on service users.ConclusionsModels of integrated care may enhance patient satisfaction, increase perceived quality of care, and enable access to services, although the evidence for other outcomes including service costs remains unclear. Indications of improved access may have important implications for services struggling to cope with increasing demand.Trial registrationProspero registration number: 42016037725.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3161-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Key stakeholders’ views on the quality of care and services available to frail seniors in Canada

“…A scoping literature review concluded that access to community-based primary healthcare can be improved for vulnerable populations by a formal integration of services, while also reducing hospitalizations, emergency department admissions, and unmet healthcare needs [15]. Another recent review concluded that integrated care improved access to care for older people, and quality of care [16]. …”

Clinical effectiveness of an intermediate care inpatient model based on integrated care pathways

“…However, the patient's characteristics at admission seem to strongly influence the destination at discharge, and the impact of the type of care on the clinical outcome of these patients is heterogeneous – particularly in long‐term care – probably owing to the diversity of approaches among integrated care programs . It is worth mentioning that most studies investigating the benefits of integrated care models focused on the use of healthcare resources and subjective assessments, such as quality of care, rather than the clinical outcome of institutionalized patients …”

“…Since 2006, the activity of various centers in this area has shifted to integrated approaches of care, intended to enhance coordination between healthcare professionals to improve care transitions and create a continuum through the various levels of care . Although the impact of integrated care pathways on healthcare costs is still a matter of debate, their implementation has proven significant benefits regarding patient's quality of life, dependence level, satisfaction and perceived quality of care …”

“…Integrated care models require the interaction between various healthcare providers and, therefore, their implementation should be tailored to the healthcare organization of each area. In this regard, some authors have stressed the need to consider contextual differences before implementing the same model in different locations . In our area, various studies have reported benefits of the CGPCM on older patients in post‐acute or subacute rehabilitation settings, but none of them have investigated the impact of switching to an integrated care framework.…”

Alignment of stakeholder agendas to facilitate the adoption of school‐supervised asthma therapy

“…However, adding time in the clinic visit to focus on an evidence‐based preventive strategy like supervised asthma therapy can reduce the time the patients need to be seen for urgent or acute asthma visits . Numerous participants suggested creating an “asthma champion” in the physician offices, who would serve as a liaison between the schools, pediatric providers, and families and act as support staff for the clinicians in the pediatric practice, a model that has been shown to increase patient satisfaction, access to care, and perceived quality of care …”