2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59789-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Initial Values and the Covariance Structure on the Recovery of some Clustering Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other limitations of the K‐means method include sensitivity to initial values and outliers 33 ; local optima can be generated for certain initial values. In our study, we initialized the centers with multiple random seeds 40,41 and obtained stable clustering results. For dealing with outliers, we excluded records with mean dose greater than 5.0 DDD during any τ‐day episode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other limitations of the K‐means method include sensitivity to initial values and outliers 33 ; local optima can be generated for certain initial values. In our study, we initialized the centers with multiple random seeds 40,41 and obtained stable clustering results. For dealing with outliers, we excluded records with mean dose greater than 5.0 DDD during any τ‐day episode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerioli and Zani (2001) proposed a density search method based on quadrant counts arising from multivariate histograms to (a) help determine the number of clusters and (b) restrict initial centroids to be chosen from areas of high density; Faber (1994) suggested choosing the starting points uniformly randomly to give preference to points in dense regions. Hajnal and Loosveldt (2000) suggested that the initialization method implemented by SAS is superior to using a random seed as starting value for K-means. However, in a much broader study examining the performance of the default functions for several commercial software packages (i.e.…”
Section: Methods Of Initializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hajnal and Loosveldt (2000) suggested that the initialization method implemented by SAS is superior to using a random seed as starting value for K ‐means. However, in a much broader study examining the performance of the default functions for several commercial software packages (i.e.…”
Section: Important Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%