Abstract:Background: Considering the rapid global movement towards inclusion for students with special educational needs (SEN), there is a surprising lack of pedagogical or didactic theories regarding the ways in which inclusive education may affect students with SEN. Group composition within the educational setting may play a role in determining the academic achievement, socio-emotional development, and wellbeing of students with SEN. Proponents of inclusion propose that segregated educational placement causes stigmat… Show more
“…Second, there were no differences in the reading and math skills of students with SEN in regular and special classes in Estonianlanguage schools. Similarly, it has been previously found that there may be no differences in academic skills between students with SEN in regular and special classes (Dalgaard et al, 2022;Hienonen et al, 2021;Ruijs & Peetsma, 2009). These results suggest that in crosssectional studies in Estonianlanguage schools, an inclusive or segregated classroom environ ment is not associated with student academic success.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Earlier studies have shown slightly different results between class placement and academic skills of students with SEN (Dalgaard et al, 2022;Hienonen et al, 2021, Kivirähk & Kiive, 2022Krämer et al, 2021;Ruijs & Peetsma, 2009). The reasons for this can be many, such as how the learning process is organized and SEN definition, which can vary from country to country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sageli ei ole erinevatel osapooltel suhtumises kaasavasse haridusse üksmeelt (Häidkind ja Oras, 2016;Kivirand et al, 2020;Leijen et al, 2021;Pedaste et al, 2021). Kaasava hariduse rakendamise seoseid HEV õpilaste ja teiste, see tähendab ilma HEVita õpilaste akadeemiliste ja sotsiaalemotsionaalsete oskustega on ana lüüsitud mitmetes suuremahulistes uurimustes (vt ülevaateuuringuid Dalgaard et al, 2022;Krämer et al, 2021;Ruijs & Peetsma, 2009;Szumski et al, 2017). Järgnevalt anname ülevaate uurimustest, kus on analüüsitud kaasava hariduse rakenda mise seoseid HEV õpilaste akadeemilise toimetulekuga.…”
Section: Teoreetiline Raamistikunclassified
“…Varasemates uuringutes HEV õpilaste akadeemiliste oskuste kohta erinevates klassikeskondades on saadud erinevaid tulemusi (näiteks Dalgaard et al, 2022;Hienonen et al, 2021;Kivirähk & Kiive, 2022;Krämer et al, 2021;Ruijs & Peetsma, 2009), mis võivad olla seotud erinevate aspektidega, sealhulgas õppe korralduse ja HEV määratlusega, mis on riigiti erinevad. Seetõttu on oluline teada saada, kuidas kaasav hariduskorraldus on Eestis rakendunud.…”
Selle uurimistöö eesmärk on kirjeldada hariduslike erivajadustega (HEV) õpilaste lugemis- ja matemaatikaoskuste seoseid tava- või eriklassis õppimisega. Valimisse kuulus 3369 kolmanda klassi last (poisse 50%, 209 klassist, 135 koolist) ning 3340 kuuenda klassi last (poisse 51%, 200 klassist, 134 koolist) eesti- ja venekeelsetest koolidest. Õpilased täitsid koolitundide ajal veebipõhised lugemise ladususe, loetu mõistmise, arvutamise ja tekstülesannete testid. Tulemustest selgus, et tava- ja eriklassis õppivate HEV õpilaste lugemis- ja matemaatikaoskused olid sarnasel tasemel, välja arvatud vene õppekeelega koolide kuuendates klassides, kus tavaklassis õppivad HEV õpilased said tekstülesannete lahendamises kõrgema skoori võrreldes eriklassis õppivate HEV õpilastega. Uuring annab esmase ülevaate eesti- ja venekeelsete koolide kolmandate ja kuuendate klasside HEV õpilaste kaasamise olukorrast ja akadeemilistest oskustest.
Summary
“…Second, there were no differences in the reading and math skills of students with SEN in regular and special classes in Estonianlanguage schools. Similarly, it has been previously found that there may be no differences in academic skills between students with SEN in regular and special classes (Dalgaard et al, 2022;Hienonen et al, 2021;Ruijs & Peetsma, 2009). These results suggest that in crosssectional studies in Estonianlanguage schools, an inclusive or segregated classroom environ ment is not associated with student academic success.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Earlier studies have shown slightly different results between class placement and academic skills of students with SEN (Dalgaard et al, 2022;Hienonen et al, 2021, Kivirähk & Kiive, 2022Krämer et al, 2021;Ruijs & Peetsma, 2009). The reasons for this can be many, such as how the learning process is organized and SEN definition, which can vary from country to country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sageli ei ole erinevatel osapooltel suhtumises kaasavasse haridusse üksmeelt (Häidkind ja Oras, 2016;Kivirand et al, 2020;Leijen et al, 2021;Pedaste et al, 2021). Kaasava hariduse rakendamise seoseid HEV õpilaste ja teiste, see tähendab ilma HEVita õpilaste akadeemiliste ja sotsiaalemotsionaalsete oskustega on ana lüüsitud mitmetes suuremahulistes uurimustes (vt ülevaateuuringuid Dalgaard et al, 2022;Krämer et al, 2021;Ruijs & Peetsma, 2009;Szumski et al, 2017). Järgnevalt anname ülevaate uurimustest, kus on analüüsitud kaasava hariduse rakenda mise seoseid HEV õpilaste akadeemilise toimetulekuga.…”
Section: Teoreetiline Raamistikunclassified
“…Varasemates uuringutes HEV õpilaste akadeemiliste oskuste kohta erinevates klassikeskondades on saadud erinevaid tulemusi (näiteks Dalgaard et al, 2022;Hienonen et al, 2021;Kivirähk & Kiive, 2022;Krämer et al, 2021;Ruijs & Peetsma, 2009), mis võivad olla seotud erinevate aspektidega, sealhulgas õppe korralduse ja HEV määratlusega, mis on riigiti erinevad. Seetõttu on oluline teada saada, kuidas kaasav hariduskorraldus on Eestis rakendunud.…”
Selle uurimistöö eesmärk on kirjeldada hariduslike erivajadustega (HEV) õpilaste lugemis- ja matemaatikaoskuste seoseid tava- või eriklassis õppimisega. Valimisse kuulus 3369 kolmanda klassi last (poisse 50%, 209 klassist, 135 koolist) ning 3340 kuuenda klassi last (poisse 51%, 200 klassist, 134 koolist) eesti- ja venekeelsetest koolidest. Õpilased täitsid koolitundide ajal veebipõhised lugemise ladususe, loetu mõistmise, arvutamise ja tekstülesannete testid. Tulemustest selgus, et tava- ja eriklassis õppivate HEV õpilaste lugemis- ja matemaatikaoskused olid sarnasel tasemel, välja arvatud vene õppekeelega koolide kuuendates klassides, kus tavaklassis õppivad HEV õpilased said tekstülesannete lahendamises kõrgema skoori võrreldes eriklassis õppivate HEV õpilastega. Uuring annab esmase ülevaate eesti- ja venekeelsete koolide kolmandate ja kuuendate klasside HEV õpilaste kaasamise olukorrast ja akadeemilistest oskustest.
Summary
“…In fact, several reviews of the literature over the past 30 years have concluded that there is no consistent evidence for the advantage of either special education or inclusive education (Cook & Cook, 2020;Dalgaard et al, 2022;Hegarty, 1993;Hornby, 1992Hornby, , 1999Lindsay, 2007;Stephenson & Ganguly, 2021). A major source of evidence for the effectiveness of interventions in the field of education is Hattie's (2009) synthesis of meta-analyses.…”
Section: Zombie 3: Fully Inclusive Education Is Effectivementioning
Zombies are defined as ideas or persistent myths that should have died out but have not. Special education's biggest zombie is that only full inclusion brings about true social justice and the most effective education for students with disabilities. Three examples of specific zombies about full inclusion are presented. First, that full inclusion has been internationally accepted policy since the Salamanca Statement in 1994. Second, that the feasibility of full inclusion has been demonstrated in some countries. Third, that there is extensive evidence that inclusion is more effective that special education. Six strategies that have been used to promote these inclusion zombies to the general public and legislators in various countries around the world are discussed. These are: reframing the problem; denying its reality; portraying special education as something of which most people disapprove; presenting full inclusion as something most people want; making the distinction between the two maximally stark; casting all challenges to the zombie as addressing the wrong question or relying on flawed research and demanding unthinking belief in full inclusion. It is concluded that special education's zombies related to full inclusion must be exposed, challenged and finally eradicated so that future education provision for children with disabilities can focus on achievable goals and evidence of effectiveness rather than placement.
Key points
Special education's biggest zombie is that only full inclusion will bring true social justice to schooling because special education is essentially an inappropriate way of dealing with diversity; is a relic of the last century, unfairly discriminatory and exclusionary.
Three inclusion zombies are: that full inclusion was recommended by the Salamanca Framework; that full inclusion has been shown to be a feasible approach to meeting all special needs; and that there is convincing research evidence that inclusion is more effective than special education. All three zombies are false but widely disseminated.
Six strategies are used to promote full inclusion zombies: reframe the nature of the problem; deny the reality of the situation; portray special education as something generally disapproved of; present inclusion as something most people want; make a stark distinction between the two; cast all challenges to the zombie as flawed.
Full inclusion zombies must be exposed, challenged, and eradicated, so that continued development of theory, research and practice in the education of young people with special needs can once again be the main focus of educators in this field.
The Good Inclusion Game (GIG) is a class‐wide education intervention employing interdependent group contingencies to increase inclusive behaviors between pupils with and without special educational needs (SEN). While previous research provided evidence of effectiveness when the class of children was split into two groups, it did not assess the effects of the GIG for one whole‐class group or in the long term. The present study addresses both of these issues. Using an ABAB design, results show a one‐team version of the GIG to be effective in increasing inclusive behaviors between pupils with and without SEN. Gains were maintained across time. Implications for inclusive education interventions and teacher training are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.