1955
DOI: 10.1007/bf02993984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of inbreeding on rate of development and on fertility inDrosophila Subobscura

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several empirical data sets suggest that fitness does indeed continue to decline with consecutive generations of selfing, at least in some organisms. Hollingsworth & Maynard Smith (1955) followed 16 generations of sib mating in Drosophila melanogaster, and demonstrated that purging of genetic load did not begin until 14 or 15 generations. Wilton et al (1989) have also demonstrated that purging in Drosophila is weak enough to take many generations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several empirical data sets suggest that fitness does indeed continue to decline with consecutive generations of selfing, at least in some organisms. Hollingsworth & Maynard Smith (1955) followed 16 generations of sib mating in Drosophila melanogaster, and demonstrated that purging of genetic load did not begin until 14 or 15 generations. Wilton et al (1989) have also demonstrated that purging in Drosophila is weak enough to take many generations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several empirical studies suggest that some organisms do in fact experience a steady decrease in fitness over consecutive generations of inbreeding (e.g. Hollingsworth & Maynard Smith, 1955;Hallauer & Sears, 1973;Schuster & Michael, 1976;Monti & Frusciante, 1984) for at least the first few generations of inbreeding. We therefore discuss genetic models which may give a monotonic decline of fitness with consecutive generations of selfing, and the implications of non-monotonic decline in fitness on the predictions of this model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hollingsworth and Maynard Smith (1955) found in Drosophila subobscura that the majority of failures to hatch were caused by infertility of the inbred males, with inbreeding of the female and the zygote contributing to a lesser degree to hatching failure. In mammals, experiments by Wright (1922) on guinea pigs showed that the number of young born alive (the physiological equivalent of hatch rate in birds) was more strongly affected by maternal inbreeding then by the inbreeding of the zygote.…”
Section: Seasonal Reproductive Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schoen (1983), Dudash (1990), and Levin (1991) found no differences between one and two consecutive generations of selfing in Gilia angustifolia, Sabatia angularis, and Phlox drummondii, respectively. In contrast, fitness declines over consecutive generations ofinbreeding have been found in maize (Hallauer and Sears 1973), rapeseed (Schuster and Michael 1976), faba beans (Monti and Frusciante 1984), Drosophila (Hollingsworth and Maynard Smith 1955), and Hydrophyllum appendiculatum (Wolfe 1993). Such fitness effects could be caused by very weakly deleterious mutations (Latta 1992).…”
Section: Waller Unpubl Data)mentioning
confidence: 99%