1967
DOI: 10.1080/00029157.1967.10402560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Hypnosis and Motivational Instructions on Kinesthetic Learning

Abstract: Twenty-four male volunteer undergraduate students were equally divided into four groups-(a) hypnosis and task motivating instructions, (b) deep hypnosis and task motivating instructions, (c) task motivating instructions alone, and (d) control. Kinesthetic learning, as measured by a 10-choice-point stylus maze, was unaffected by the experimental conditions. Possible interpretations in light of recent work on physical endurance tasks are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
2

Year Published

1970
1970
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DISCUSSION These results indicate that neither posthypnotic performance-enhancing instructions, or performance-enhancing instructions alone, had a facilitative effect on the performance of this cognitive-motor task. This is in line with previous research on skill tasks (Arnold, 1971;Edmonston & Marks, 1967). Other studies which measured reaction time, however, have indicated that motivational instructions and/or alert hypnotic inductions improved performance on a reaction time task (Ham & Edmonston, 1971;Rader, 1972).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DISCUSSION These results indicate that neither posthypnotic performance-enhancing instructions, or performance-enhancing instructions alone, had a facilitative effect on the performance of this cognitive-motor task. This is in line with previous research on skill tasks (Arnold, 1971;Edmonston & Marks, 1967). Other studies which measured reaction time, however, have indicated that motivational instructions and/or alert hypnotic inductions improved performance on a reaction time task (Ham & Edmonston, 1971;Rader, 1972).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Rader (1972) found that motivational instructions, with or without hypnosis, significantly improved reaction time. Arnold (1971) and Edmonston and Marks (1967), however, found that positive involving or exhortation instructions did not improve performance on a skill task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Con respecto al aprendizaje, Edmonston y Marks (1967) no encontraron efectos significativos de la hipnosis ni de instrucciones motivacionales sobre el aprendizaje kinestésico, llegando incluso a encontrar que podía producir interferencias en el aprendizaje de una tarea. En esta línea, Arnold (1971) tampoco encontró resultados significativos sobre el aprendizaje motor de sugestiones positivas (con o sin hipnosis), ni tampoco diferencias en base a la hipnotizabilidad de los sujetos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Se valorará que se especifique la edad y sexo de los participantes, con el objetivo de poder determinar la población a la que el estudio puede generalizarse. Todos los estudios, a excepción de Young (1925), Orne (1959), London et al, (1968), Arnold (1971) y Greer y Engs (1986) (que no hacen especificaciones de la muestra); y Rosenhan y London (1963), Levitt y Brady (1964), Edmonston y Marks (1967), Fehr y Stern (1967, Jackson et al, (1979), Morton (2003) y Cracium y Szatmari (2007) (que solo especifican el sexo), añaden una descripción detallada de la muestra utilizada.…”
Section: Consideraciones Metodológicasunclassified