2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra04881j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of hydroxide and epoxide functional groups on the mechanical properties of graphene oxide and its failure mechanism by molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract: Graphene oxide (GO) could be assembled via amphiphilic interface adhesion into nano-composites.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PCL has similar strain break point, but significantly higher break point tensile stress compared to SH containing meshes. However, the slightly lower values for PCLSH30 can potentially be explained due to the lower fiber diameter and the increase in the level of functional groups (C=, OH), which have been reported to have a negative impact on elasticity [ 70 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PCL has similar strain break point, but significantly higher break point tensile stress compared to SH containing meshes. However, the slightly lower values for PCLSH30 can potentially be explained due to the lower fiber diameter and the increase in the level of functional groups (C=, OH), which have been reported to have a negative impact on elasticity [ 70 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SH containing meshes have a strain break point of 43, 52, and 38%; and br point tensile stress of 359 ± 173 kPa, 393 ± 93 kPa, and 351 ± 141 kPa for PCLSH PCLSH20, and PCLSH30, respectively (Figure 6c,d). PCL has similar strain break po but significantly higher break point tensile stress compared to SH containing mesh However, the slightly lower values for PCLSH30 can potentially be explained due to lower fiber diameter and the increase in the level of functional groups (C=, OH), wh have been reported to have a negative impact on elasticity [70].…”
Section: Swelling and Degradationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, it has been studied that cracks in the graphene oxide sheets are always initiated and propagated along the path where the hydroxyl and epoxy groups are distributed. Therefore, crosslinking helps to fix these groups and prevents the rupturing of the sheets [29]. Besides, such membranes are much more stable as compared to cation modified GO membranes.…”
Section: Membrane Integrity Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major advantages of crosslinking of GO is that the density of free functional groups is reduced and the mechanical properties of graphene sheets are enhanced. This study was done by Sun et al, using molecular dynamics simulations [29]. Therefore, the membranes developed from these cross-linked GO are highly robust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force applied to the composite material is transmitted through the interface between the fiber reinforcement and polymers, and the composite material easily breaks when the interfacial adhesiveness is weak [6,15,16]. Various studies have been conducted to improve the interfacial strength [17,18]. These studies can be roughly classified into two groups depending on the approach adopted to improve the interfacial adhesiveness [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%