1999
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of hunger on locomotory behaviour in two species of wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These traits are also important traits in female mate choice and may thus be honest signals of male quality (Mappes et al 1996;Parri et al 1997;Uetz et al 2002). Though still able to maintain minimal normal activities, spiders under natural conditions often starve (Anderson 1974;Walker et al 2000); therefore the investment in gift construction could be an indicator of male quality in P. mirabilis. In spite of some contradictions in the literature, silk wrapping seems to give males several reproductive advantages, influencing female mate acceptance, promoting longer copulations and consequently higher fertilization success (Lang 1996;Stålhandske 2002;Bilde et al 2007;Andersen et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These traits are also important traits in female mate choice and may thus be honest signals of male quality (Mappes et al 1996;Parri et al 1997;Uetz et al 2002). Though still able to maintain minimal normal activities, spiders under natural conditions often starve (Anderson 1974;Walker et al 2000); therefore the investment in gift construction could be an indicator of male quality in P. mirabilis. In spite of some contradictions in the literature, silk wrapping seems to give males several reproductive advantages, influencing female mate acceptance, promoting longer copulations and consequently higher fertilization success (Lang 1996;Stålhandske 2002;Bilde et al 2007;Andersen et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Differences in diet among individuals may not only affect survival, development, maturation time and final adult size, but also reproductive behaviour and the development and characteristics of secondary sexual traits (Anderson 1974;Uetz et al 2002;Toft and Wise 1999;Walker et al 2000;Lomborg and Toft 2009). Indeed, it has been suggested that the ''tufts'' on the forelegs of the spider Schizocosa ocreata and the percussive ''drumming'' by the spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata vary according to male feeding condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other literature on foraging strategy has investigated the role of predator hunger or attributes of prey species other than average rate of movement on hunting strategy (Inoue and Marsura, 1983;Walker et al, 1999;Ware, 1972;Orsdol, 1984); our model, reflecting its assumptions, suggests that prey velocity more than any other characteristic has a significant causal role in choice of search strategy by an associated predator. Future empirical research on hunting style across a wider range of animal species that contrasts the effects of average prey rate of movement with other predictors will be of importance in the empirical evaluation of our model and others.…”
Section: The Broader Contextmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The outcome of predatory interactions is influenced by the physiological state of the animals, attack strategies, inherent aggressiveness, and hunger level (WALKER et al 1999;WALKER & RYPSTRA 2003;MAYNTZ et al 2005). Relative sizes of individuals are also an important factor in the interaction process (FORMANOWICZ et al 1981;RYPSTRA & SAMU 2005;WISE 2006b), with larger spiders taking larger prey and smaller spiders taking smaller prey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%