1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(97)00022-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of housing on heart rate of gestating sows during specific behaviours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
2
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Heart rate did not differ between treatments, in contrast to a previous study in which stalled sows had higher heart rates than group-housed sows (Marchant et al, 1997). In the study of Marchant et al the group system was straw-based and provided more space, factors which both probably encouraged higher levels of activity than were seen in the current study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heart rate did not differ between treatments, in contrast to a previous study in which stalled sows had higher heart rates than group-housed sows (Marchant et al, 1997). In the study of Marchant et al the group system was straw-based and provided more space, factors which both probably encouraged higher levels of activity than were seen in the current study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Stalls allow for easy management, individual feeding, and reduce aggressive encounters between individuals. However, freedom of movement is severely restricted, and confined sows have been shown to have reduced cardiovascular fitness (Marchant et al, 1997), reduced muscle weight and bone strength (Marchant and Broom, 1996), increased morbidity (Tillon and Madec, 1984), and engage in more unresolved aggression . Confinement in stalls, in conjunction with feed restriction, has been implicated in the development of oral stereotypies, repetitive, apparently functionless behaviours that probably indicate reduced welfare (Terlouw et al, 1991;Vieuille-Thomas et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the defeat in the food competition test in the present experiment did not seem to be specifically stressful, as heart rate in defeated pigs was not significantly higher than heart rate in winners of the food competition test. However, the presentation of food after food deprivation may result in a large increase in heart rate in the food competition test (Houpt et al 1983;Marchant et al 1997), which may mask the effects of relative success of agonistic interactions on heart rate in the test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although better management and stockmanship skills may be required, keeping sows in groups and giving them freedom of movement is commonly -but not universally (e.g. Barnett et al, 2001;McGlone et al, 2004) -believed to improve their welfare compared with housing them individually (Broom et al, 1995;Marchant et al, 1997;Bracke et al, 1999Bracke et al, , 2002. In North America, individual sow housing is also losing favour but the change is driven by market forces (corporations like Smithfield Foods, Maple Leaf, Burger King and Cargill Pork decided to discourage or phase out individual housing systems) rather than direct legislation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%