1994
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.1918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of HIV/AIDS intervention groups for high-risk women in urban clinics.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE. This study reports the results of a behavior change intervention offered to women at high risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection seen in an urban primary health care clinic. METHODS. Participants were 197 women randomly assigned to either an HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) risk reduction group or a comparison group. Women in the HIV/AIDS intervention group attended five group sessions focusing on risk education; skills training in condom use, sexual assertiveness, proble… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
145
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, condom-use skills assessed by direct observation were not significantly associated with condom use per se. Condom proficiency skill tasks are commonly used in HIV risk-reduction intervention outcome studies and have appeared superior to selfreport measures because they are likely to be less susceptible to demand characteristics and other sources of response bias (Kelly et al, 1994;Malow et al, 1998;Somlai et al, 1998). Unfortunately, our study findings do not support using objectively assessed condom application skills as predictors of condom use, even in the context of our use of cross-sectional data that could maximize our sensitivity to detect such a relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, condom-use skills assessed by direct observation were not significantly associated with condom use per se. Condom proficiency skill tasks are commonly used in HIV risk-reduction intervention outcome studies and have appeared superior to selfreport measures because they are likely to be less susceptible to demand characteristics and other sources of response bias (Kelly et al, 1994;Malow et al, 1998;Somlai et al, 1998). Unfortunately, our study findings do not support using objectively assessed condom application skills as predictors of condom use, even in the context of our use of cross-sectional data that could maximize our sensitivity to detect such a relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual risk behaviours were assessed using a modified version of a sexual risk assessment instrument previously used in other research (Kalichman et al, 1996;Kelly et al, 1994). The sexual risk assessment included retrospective recall of numbers of sex partners, unprotected sex acts, and condom use during the previous three months.…”
Section: Sexual Risk Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30][31][32] Network influence, for example, has been used successfully in a study in Tanzania that was designed to promote HIV prevention through a campaign designed to increase community-wide talk about HIV and family planning. 32 In another study, Kelly et al 33 used opinion leaders to teach individuals in the gay community to encourage condom use.…”
Section: Implication For Hiv Prevention Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research indicates that group behavioural risk-reduction interventions that combine HIV education with condom use and relational skills training can result in reductions in sex risk behaviour (Kelly et al, 1994;Ashery, Wild, Zhao, Rosenshine, & Young, 1997;McCoy, McCoy, & Lai, 1998), including among individuals with HIV/AIDS Kalichman, Rompa, & Cage, 2005;Heckman et al, 2001). Social support from peers is an important factor for group intervention durability and sustainability (Shain et al, 1999;Kelly et al, 1994;van Empelen, Kok, van Kesteren, van den Borne, Bos, & Schaalma, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social support from peers is an important factor for group intervention durability and sustainability (Shain et al, 1999;Kelly et al, 1994;van Empelen, Kok, van Kesteren, van den Borne, Bos, & Schaalma, 2003). If effective, a group format is also a more cost-effective intervention than an individual format.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%