2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of high-fidelity simulation training on empathy and attitudes toward older people among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results of the reflective diary theme analysis suggest that the reflective aspect of narrative education can improve nursing students’ skills in basic nursing operations with children, enhance their professionalism in understanding the psychology and emotions of children and their families, promote the exploration of scientific care, and aid in the implementation of recovery methods for children. Arrogante et al’s (2022) findings in geriatric nursing indicated that simulation could improve empathy and attitudes toward patients, leading to a better quality of care. In summary, narrative education is a continuous teaching method that combines learning with practice and experience with reflection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of the reflective diary theme analysis suggest that the reflective aspect of narrative education can improve nursing students’ skills in basic nursing operations with children, enhance their professionalism in understanding the psychology and emotions of children and their families, promote the exploration of scientific care, and aid in the implementation of recovery methods for children. Arrogante et al’s (2022) findings in geriatric nursing indicated that simulation could improve empathy and attitudes toward patients, leading to a better quality of care. In summary, narrative education is a continuous teaching method that combines learning with practice and experience with reflection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have shown the effectiveness of simulation-based training on geriatrics education [ 27 ], which improved attitudes towards older adults [ 28 , 29 , 55 ], there is a lack of studies that analyze its efficacy on the adequate management of nursing related to the social isolation and loneliness of older adults. Our simulation scenarios were centered on nursing care provided by students via telephone interviews, with diverse situations based on the telecare that volunteers must provide for the social isolation and loneliness of older adults; a script that could help in the development of the simulated call ( Supplementary Materials S1 ) is provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, there is no doubt that clinical simulation is an essential component of health science education [ 26 ]. Clinical simulation plays a fundamental role in the training of health sciences students for the care of older adults [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. It also provides opportunities for students to develop comprehensive care that is centered on the individual and the challenges faced by older adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it is suggested to design intervention plans in university students based on empathy [ 47 ] and positive education about aging and contact experiences [ 48 ], which could potentially be part of an international strategy to improve perceptions of older people and the aging process. Thus, there is evidence of interventions based on high-fidelity simulation carried out with nursing students, who underwent training for the development of attitudes towards older adults and empathy skills, who found an improvement in the scores obtained on Kogan’s scale and therefore improving the levels of empathy and positive attitudes towards old age [ 49 ]. Additional research using more-rigorous designs to examine the effects of interventions is strongly recommended [ 47 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%