1990
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.1990.01.0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise by normal-hearinglisteners

Abstract: Abstract-This investigation measured the degree to which hearing aids degrade speech discrimination in noise . Ten normal-hearing subjects were tested for speech reception thresholds (SRT) in noise . The tests were repeated under two aided conditions : one used binaural behind-the-ear (BTE) aids, the other an experimental binaural high-fidelity aid fitted with in-the-ear transducers . To assess the loss of any directional cues under aided conditions, a test environment producing directional cues in both horizo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This causes significant problems for hearing-impaired students in educational settings due to the high levels of noise and long reverberation times found in most classrooms (Bess, Sinclair, & Riggs, 1984;Finitzo-Heiber, 198 1 ;Olsen, 1988;Ross et al, 1982;Ross & Giolas, 1971;Watson, 1964). In general, the problem cannot be corrected with hearing aids alone because hearing aids amplify background sounds as well as the primary signal (McAlister, 1990;Nabelek, Donahue, & Letowski, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes significant problems for hearing-impaired students in educational settings due to the high levels of noise and long reverberation times found in most classrooms (Bess, Sinclair, & Riggs, 1984;Finitzo-Heiber, 198 1 ;Olsen, 1988;Ross et al, 1982;Ross & Giolas, 1971;Watson, 1964). In general, the problem cannot be corrected with hearing aids alone because hearing aids amplify background sounds as well as the primary signal (McAlister, 1990;Nabelek, Donahue, & Letowski, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%