2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of hand preference and sex on right-left asymmetry in dorsal digit lengths among adults and children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, because, in the present study, we found that sexual dimorphism occurs in palmar 2D:4D ratio but not in dorsal 2D:4D ratio (a faithful reflector of bone 2D:4D ratio, Auger & Eustache, 2011), and because placing of flexion creases is the only substantive difference between dorsal and palmar digit lengths, perhaps palmar 2D:4D ratio is reflecting sexual dimorphism in the placing of flexion creases between digits 2 and 4. This is consistent with the findings of earlier studies (Kumar et al, 2019, 2021). Thus, perhaps the placing of flexion creases and the bone digit length, the two different factors, combine to determine the occurrence of sexual dimorphism in the palmar 2D:4D ratio.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, because, in the present study, we found that sexual dimorphism occurs in palmar 2D:4D ratio but not in dorsal 2D:4D ratio (a faithful reflector of bone 2D:4D ratio, Auger & Eustache, 2011), and because placing of flexion creases is the only substantive difference between dorsal and palmar digit lengths, perhaps palmar 2D:4D ratio is reflecting sexual dimorphism in the placing of flexion creases between digits 2 and 4. This is consistent with the findings of earlier studies (Kumar et al, 2019, 2021). Thus, perhaps the placing of flexion creases and the bone digit length, the two different factors, combine to determine the occurrence of sexual dimorphism in the palmar 2D:4D ratio.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…However, the effect of hand preference is negated because individuals frequently employ both hands to perform many tasks. 25 Our study also found no difference in growth rate in both hands. The final length of the long bones is determined by estrogen as it is responsible for fusion of their epiphyseal growth plates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Previous reports showed that right-handed subjects are taller than left-handed [58] . Moreover, the right-hand dominance can cause increased right directional linear growth and muscle mass reflecting in final expression of size and shape which in turn affects stature correlation with upper limb parts [25,59] . Moreover, the differential human responses to stresses during development can result in small random deviations from this general pattern [60] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 58 ] Moreover, the right-hand dominance can cause increased right directional linear growth and muscle mass reflecting in final expression of size and shape which in turn affects stature correlation with upper limb parts. [ 25 , 59 ] Moreover, the differential human responses to stresses during development can result in small random deviations from this general pattern. [ 60 ] There are clear population-specific variations in the relationships between limb/part measurements and stature, which are related to diverse factors, including nutrition, physical activity, environment, and genetic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%