The effects of habitat filtering and non‐habitat processes on species spatial distribution vary across life stages

Shi, Wei; Qiongdao, Zhang; Sui, Xinghua; Li, Buhang; He, Fangliang; Chu, Chengjin

doi:10.1002/ajb2.1140

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 46 publications

(63 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All species were classified into one of three life forms: shrub, subtree and canopy tree following the Flora of China ( Wu and Peter, 2013 ). Each life form was divided into three life stages: sapling, juvenile and adult referring to their size-class structure ( Yang et al, 2020 ) and according to their DBH ( Peters, 2003 ; Baldeck et al, 2013 ; Piao et al, 2013 ; Zhu et al, 2015 ; Shi et al, 2018 ; Pu et al, 2020 ; Table 1 ). Samples of focal species were then selected of at least 50 individuals in each life stage, because, less than 50 individuals would cause data analyses inaccuracy.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neighborhood Effects on Tree Mortality Depend on Life Stage of Neighbors

Liu

Yang

et al. 2022

Front. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neighborhood effects are a crucial ecological processes that allow species to coexist in a forest. Conspecific and heterospecific neighbors, as major group classifications, affect tree mortality through various mechanisms associated with neighbor life stages. However, the influence of neighbor life stages on neighborhood effects and by what mechanisms remains a knowledge gap. Here we censused the mortality of 82,202 trees belonging to 30 species in a 20-ha subtropical forest and classified their neighbors into the following life stages: earlier, same and later. Next, we implemented generalized linear mixed models to estimate the effect of neighbors at different life stages on tree mortality. Our results showed that conspecific later stage neighbors had a positive effect on tree mortality overall, while conspecific earlier stage neighbors had a negative effect on tree mortality. Furthermore, these opposing effects appear to offset each other so that the overall effect of conspecific neighbors on tree mortality is weakened. In contrast, heterospecific neighbors had a decreasing effect on tree mortality overall. These effects are consistent with those of later stage heterospecific neighbors. Our findings demonstrate that neighbors strongly impact tree mortality, and their specific effects are closely related to neighbor life stages. Further, any single effect from one neighbor life stage may disturb or dominate the total effects of the neighbors. Therefore, the neighbors must be divided into different life stages to best explain the neighborhood effect on forest dynamics.

show abstract