1946
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1946.tb05388.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of group psychotherapy on personality inventory scores.

Abstract: ROUP psychotherapy of a permissive nature has been carried on by the authors, a clinical psychologist and a neuropsychiatrist, with psychiatric battle casualties. Treatment has been afforded in two separate groups, each conducted by one of the authors, as described in separate articles (2) (3) (4). Patients attended the group meetings, in most cases, for approximately six weeks.The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (1) was administered to twenty-two patients, insofar as possible at the beginning and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1946
1946
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other investigators, such as Kaufmann (5), Gallagher (4), Mosak (7), and Rashkis and Shaskin (8), have reported observations of MMPI changes following psychotherapy; the distinctive feature of the present research is the use of a control group consisting of patients who are in need of therapy and who want it, but who do not receive it.…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Other investigators, such as Kaufmann (5), Gallagher (4), Mosak (7), and Rashkis and Shaskin (8), have reported observations of MMPI changes following psychotherapy; the distinctive feature of the present research is the use of a control group consisting of patients who are in need of therapy and who want it, but who do not receive it.…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The most serious error frequently made is the misinterpretation of results caused by the faulty assumption that there is no test-retest effect and that consequently differences between the initial and final test scores should be attributed to some external variable (7, 10, 11, 89,95,97). This error is common in the interpretation of test scores of individual clinical cases (3,20,30,46,65,68,75,93,96).…”
Section: Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Group psychotherapy has been studied experimentally (24), evaluated by means of tests (37), and in terms of improvement as judged by therapist or patient (1, 9,12,15,17).…”
Section: Counselingmentioning
confidence: 99%