2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of graphene oxide-silica nanohybrids on the workability, hydration, and mechanical properties of Portland cement paste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows the spreading and Marsh cone flow time for the reference sample and the samples with different mixing quantities of GOS. With the increase of GOS, the spreading of cement pastes gradually decreased; however, the Marsh cone flow time gradually increased, which is consistent with the literature [33,34]. When the GOS increased from 0 to 0.07%, the spreading reduced from 220 mm to 150 mm, a decrease of 31.82%.…”
Section: The Spreading and Marsh Cone Flow Time With Different Concen...supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 shows the spreading and Marsh cone flow time for the reference sample and the samples with different mixing quantities of GOS. With the increase of GOS, the spreading of cement pastes gradually decreased; however, the Marsh cone flow time gradually increased, which is consistent with the literature [33,34]. When the GOS increased from 0 to 0.07%, the spreading reduced from 220 mm to 150 mm, a decrease of 31.82%.…”
Section: The Spreading and Marsh Cone Flow Time With Different Concen...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, in the middle and later stages of hydration, the GOS that fills in the pores will consume CH to produce a secondary hydration reaction, resulting in more C-S-H gel. On the other hand, the C-S-H gel grown on the GOS layer is tightly connected, which can effectively prevent the propagation of microcracks and effectively improve the bending strength of cement-based materials [33].…”
Section: The Comparison Of Macro Performance For Cement-based Gos And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of how the SiO 2 nanoparticles prevent GO aggregation in ionic environments was explored in detail in our previous studies. 28,29 Second, the deposited SiO 2 nanoparticles acted as a structure-directing platform for the vertical growth of 2D CSH nanoplates on the surface of GO.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, three major techniques are applied: (1) mechanical mixing of silica fume with GO water dispersion, prior to cement addition, [ 38 ] (2) the incorporation of GO encapsulated silica fume particles, [ 45 ] and (3) the deposition of nanosilica particles on GO nanosheets via a sol‐gel method by in situ hydrolysis and condensation of tetraethylorthosilicate ( Figure a). [ 46–48 ] Analogously, Wang et al. [ 34 ] have reported that also the addition of fly ash prevents the flocculation of GO, thus increasing the fluidity of GO‐cement mix.…”
Section: Fabrication Protocols For Graphene‐based Cementitious Compositesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As aforementioned, an additional approach to fabricate GO‐based cementitious composites relies on the use of silica fume, which plays a double role by ensuring the sufficient dispersion of GO and fluidity of fresh cement mix as well as by initiating the pozzolanic reaction, that is a reaction between silica fume and Ca(OH) 2 resulting in the formation of secondary CSH phase. [ 45–48 ] Nevertheless, the combination of GO and silica fume leads only to the slight increase of mechanical properties of cement composites: the maximum increase of the 28‐day compressive, flexural, and tensile strength up to 33%, [ 46 ] 35%, [ 48 ] and 31%, [ 47 ] respectively, has been reported so far.…”
Section: Microstructure–properties Relationship In Graphene‐based Cementitious Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%