1981
DOI: 10.3386/w0655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Government Regulation on Teenage Smoking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
106
2
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
10
106
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent research has shown that the Fairness Doctrine antismoking advertisements resulted in a decline in per capita cigarette consumption of at least 5% (2-6) and a reduction in the prevalence of teenage smoking of 3 percentage points (6). In fact, the antismoking advertisements were found to have had an effect that was nearly six times that of cigarette advertising during this period (4).…”
Section: History Current Status and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Subsequent research has shown that the Fairness Doctrine antismoking advertisements resulted in a decline in per capita cigarette consumption of at least 5% (2-6) and a reduction in the prevalence of teenage smoking of 3 percentage points (6). In fact, the antismoking advertisements were found to have had an effect that was nearly six times that of cigarette advertising during this period (4).…”
Section: History Current Status and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Existing research has focused on their impact on adult smoking cessation or overall cigarette consumption. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The few studies of the impact of these campaigns on youth smoking had mixed results. Community-and school-based interventions highlighted by a mass media campaign reduced smoking initiation rates among adolescents in Vermont, New York, and Montana, [21][22][23][24][25] Minnesota, 26 North Karelia, 27 and Norway, 28 but they failed to influence smoking behavior among youths in southern California 29 or the southeastern United States.…”
Section: Michael Siegel MD Mph and Lois Biener Phdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]33,34 Importantly, however, recent research has suggested that the positive effect of state-sponsored anti-tobacco ads was manifest only at a threshold level of at least one unit of exposure over a 4-month period. 27 The implication of this threshold effect is that minimal levels of anti-tobacco advertising do not have a significant association with smoking-related outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Research from tobacco control has shown that paid anti-tobacco advertising is associated with increased antitobacco attitudes and beliefs and reduced tobacco use. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] To the extent that obesity reflects modifiable behaviors that have similarities with smoking-related behaviors, public health anti-obesity media campaigns promise to contribute to reductions in population obesity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%