2015
DOI: 10.15390/eb.2015.4033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of gender, seniority and subject matter variables on teachers’ organizational citizenship behaviors in Turkey: A meta-Analysis

Abstract: ÖzAnahtar Kelimeler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect size classification with regards to Cohen's d coefficient was as follows (Cohen, 1988): d<.20 (low effect); .20<d<.50 (medium effect); .50<d<.80 (high effect). However, effect sizes lower than .10 were considered as a very low effect (Yılmaz, Altınkurt, & Yıldırım 2015). In the study, women teachers were considered as experimental group and male teachers as control group for gender variable; married as experimental and single as control group for marital status variable; class teachers as experimental and subject teachers as control group for subject matter variable; teachers working at public schools as experimental and teachers at private schools as control group for school type variable, teachers with 10 years or less seniority as experimental and teachers with 11 years or more seniority as control group for seniority variable, and teachers with undergraduate (BA) degree as experimental and teachers with graduate (MA or Ph.D.) degree as control group for educational status variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect size classification with regards to Cohen's d coefficient was as follows (Cohen, 1988): d<.20 (low effect); .20<d<.50 (medium effect); .50<d<.80 (high effect). However, effect sizes lower than .10 were considered as a very low effect (Yılmaz, Altınkurt, & Yıldırım 2015). In the study, women teachers were considered as experimental group and male teachers as control group for gender variable; married as experimental and single as control group for marital status variable; class teachers as experimental and subject teachers as control group for subject matter variable; teachers working at public schools as experimental and teachers at private schools as control group for school type variable, teachers with 10 years or less seniority as experimental and teachers with 11 years or more seniority as control group for seniority variable, and teachers with undergraduate (BA) degree as experimental and teachers with graduate (MA or Ph.D.) degree as control group for educational status variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect size classification with regards to Cohen's d coefficient was as follows (Cohen, 1988): d<.20 (low effect); .20<d<.50 (medium effect); .50<d<.80 (high effect). However, effect sizes lower than .10 were considered as a very low effect (Yılmaz, Altınkurt, & Yıldırım 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Son zamanlarda yönetim alanyazınında örgütsel vatandaşlık kavramını ele alan çalışmalara sıkça rastlanmaktadır (Baş ve Şentürk, 2011;DiPaola ve Tschannen-Moran, 2001;Ilisu, 2012;Jimmieson, Hannam ve Yeo, 2010;Somech ve Ron, 2007;Yılmaz, Altınkurt ve Yıldırım, 2015;Zeinabadi ve Salehi, 2011). Özellikle sosyal ve açık bir sistem özelliği gösteren örgütlerin, sürekli değişen koşullar altında varlıklarını sürdürebilmeleri, biçimsel iş tanımlarının ötesine geçebilen çalışanlarıyla mümkün görünmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified