2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00148-011-0391-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of food stamp receipt on weight gained by expectant mothers

Abstract: With over 66% of Americans overweight, expectant mothers are unusual because they are encouraged to gain weight while pregnant. Food stamp receipt (FSR) may facilitate recommended weight gain by providing resources for food and nutrition. I examine the effects of FSR on the amount of weight gained by low-income expectant mothers using NLSY79 data. Results indicate FSR decreases the probability gaining insufficient weight but does not exacerbate the probability of gaining too much weight. Examining the effects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… F&V intake Low-income postpartum women intervention 1, n = 168, intervention 2, n = 140; control n = 143 WIC Participants in the intervention sites increased consumption of F&V. The increase was sustained 6 months after the intervention was terminated ( p < 0.001). None recorded Yes Weak 2001 Farmers market participants increased consumption of F&V by 1.4 servings per 100 kcal of consumed food ( p < 0.001) from baseline to the end of intervention compared to the control group, and supermarket participants increased by 0.8 servings per 100 kcal ( p = 0.02) 6 months Baum [ 41 ] 2012 USA Longitudinal study FSP on expectant mothers Weight gained by expectant mothers during pregnancy Low income expectant mothers n = 709 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Food Stamp Receipt (FSR) decreases the probability of gaining insufficient weight during pregnancy with FSR increasing pregnancy weight gain by 1.78 lb ( p < 0.05). However, it does not result in pregnant mothers gaining too much weight None recorded Yes Weak 1979–2002 23 years Black [ 45 ] 2013 New South Wales, Australia Before and after uncontrolled study Weekly box of subsidized fruit and vegetables up to $60 linked to preventive health services (annual health assessment including dental and hearing check-ups, blood testing) and nutritional promotion Change in the episode of illness, health service and emergency department attendances, antibiotic prescription, BMI Low-income Aboriginal families with one or more childre n <17 years of age who were regular patients at the respective health services n = 167 Retrospective health records audit and health assessment from Aboriginal health services, local hospitals and any other nominated general practices A significant decrease ( p < 0.05) in oral antibiotics prescribed (−0.5 prescriptions/year; 95%CI, −0.8 to −0.2) during 12 months of participation in the programme compared with the 12 months before the programme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… F&V intake Low-income postpartum women intervention 1, n = 168, intervention 2, n = 140; control n = 143 WIC Participants in the intervention sites increased consumption of F&V. The increase was sustained 6 months after the intervention was terminated ( p < 0.001). None recorded Yes Weak 2001 Farmers market participants increased consumption of F&V by 1.4 servings per 100 kcal of consumed food ( p < 0.001) from baseline to the end of intervention compared to the control group, and supermarket participants increased by 0.8 servings per 100 kcal ( p = 0.02) 6 months Baum [ 41 ] 2012 USA Longitudinal study FSP on expectant mothers Weight gained by expectant mothers during pregnancy Low income expectant mothers n = 709 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 Food Stamp Receipt (FSR) decreases the probability of gaining insufficient weight during pregnancy with FSR increasing pregnancy weight gain by 1.78 lb ( p < 0.05). However, it does not result in pregnant mothers gaining too much weight None recorded Yes Weak 1979–2002 23 years Black [ 45 ] 2013 New South Wales, Australia Before and after uncontrolled study Weekly box of subsidized fruit and vegetables up to $60 linked to preventive health services (annual health assessment including dental and hearing check-ups, blood testing) and nutritional promotion Change in the episode of illness, health service and emergency department attendances, antibiotic prescription, BMI Low-income Aboriginal families with one or more childre n <17 years of age who were regular patients at the respective health services n = 167 Retrospective health records audit and health assessment from Aboriginal health services, local hospitals and any other nominated general practices A significant decrease ( p < 0.05) in oral antibiotics prescribed (−0.5 prescriptions/year; 95%CI, −0.8 to −0.2) during 12 months of participation in the programme compared with the 12 months before the programme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…given estimates of the regression model. Here, (4) represents the probability of a child having an anthropometric measure above  * in the terminal period conditional on an initial measure greater than or equal to some value  0 . For example, one might be interested in the probability of a child having a BMI above the 85  percentile in period  conditional on being above the 85  percentile in the initial period,  = 0.…”
Section: Methods Of Moments (Gmm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To proceed, we simulate probabilities, such as those given by (4), under the following counterfactual scenarios:…”
Section: Methods Of Moments (Gmm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, because birth weight is likely to be endogenous, we utilize instruments based on statelevel regulations that a¤ect participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) similar to Meyerhoefer and Pylypchuk (2008). SNAP (formerly known as the Food Stamp Program) has been show to a¤ect the health of low-income pregnant women and, hence, a¤ect pregnancy outcomes (Baum 2012). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%