2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01520-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of food limitation on behavior, corticosterone, and the use of social information in the red crossbill (Loxia curvirostra)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Activity levels declined over time in all food-restricted birds—regardless of social information delivery—suggesting that the time-limited feedings imposed a relatively severe energy deficit. Many animal taxa show increased activity during mild or short-term food restriction [19,6062] but then reduce activity if restriction more severely limits energy intake over time [49,60]. In this study, there was an interaction that suggested that birds with predictive social information may have initiated this decline in activity slightly earlier than birds with parallel social information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Activity levels declined over time in all food-restricted birds—regardless of social information delivery—suggesting that the time-limited feedings imposed a relatively severe energy deficit. Many animal taxa show increased activity during mild or short-term food restriction [19,6062] but then reduce activity if restriction more severely limits energy intake over time [49,60]. In this study, there was an interaction that suggested that birds with predictive social information may have initiated this decline in activity slightly earlier than birds with parallel social information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Controls had access to food ad libitum for the entire experiment. Focal and neighbour birds in the social groups each experienced 3 days of food restriction during which they had access to food for two 45 min feeding sessions per day [19,46]. Food was provided in a covered cup to minimize spills and food intake was calculated as the change in grams of food remaining in the cup across a 24 h period, measured with an electronic balance to the nearest 0.01 g. Multiple food cups were provided in neighbour cages to ensure both birds had access to food during the feeding periods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other components can fluctuate, such as increased energetic cost of reproduction or seasonal food availability. Thus, the relative value of social information use could be higher due to the animal being risk‐averse, being in an energetically challenging state, or having limited food options, or it could be lower if it is a food generalist or if social information is common, for instance if density of foraging conspecifics and thus density of social information in the landscape is high (Webster & Laland, 2011; Spiegel et al ., 2013; Wurtz, Cussen & Cornelius, 2021). This is further modulated by an animal's current knowledge about its environment.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%