The effects of foam roll on perceptual and performance recovery during a futsal tournament

Rahimi, Ali; Amani-Shalamzari, Sadegh; Clemente, Filipe Manuel

doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112981

Cited by 11 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The initial search of the literature detected (Table 1) 36 articles related to recovery in FT; nevertheless, 29 were excluded after a thorough in-depth analyses of full texts for being unrelated to recovery in FT or failure to fulfil the inclusion criteria, or both. A total of final seven studies (De Marchi, et al, 2019;Dos Santos, et al, 2020;Nunes, et al, 2020;Rahimi, Amani-Shalamzari, & Clemente, 2020;Tessitore, et al, 2008;Wilke, et al, 2019;Wilke, et al, 2020) (195 vs 191), blood lactate concentration post YYIR1 (11.1 vs13.5). 7) Rahimi et al (2020) investigated the efficacy of recovery using a foam roll (FROLL) on performance, physiological and psychological parameters on the sample of 16 youth futsal players, in a simulated futsal tournament.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of final seven studies (De Marchi, et al, 2019;Dos Santos, et al, 2020;Nunes, et al, 2020;Rahimi, Amani-Shalamzari, & Clemente, 2020;Tessitore, et al, 2008;Wilke, et al, 2019;Wilke, et al, 2020) (195 vs 191), blood lactate concentration post YYIR1 (11.1 vs13.5). 7) Rahimi et al (2020) investigated the efficacy of recovery using a foam roll (FROLL) on performance, physiological and psychological parameters on the sample of 16 youth futsal players, in a simulated futsal tournament. The FROLL recovery protocol consisted of five repetitions of 40s on calf, quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteus muscles, with 20 s rest between, done for five minutes after each match.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This narrative review aimed to describe the current published literature related to recovery strategies in FT in order to give applied infor- (De Marchi, et al, 2019;Dos Santos, et al, 2020;Nunes, et al, 2020;Rahimi, et al, 2020;Tessitore, et al, 2008;Wilke, et al, 2019;Wilke, et al, 2020). The main conclusions propose different post practice recovery profiles among FT players, which are possibly influenced by their physical abilities and age/ sport experience (Wilke, et al, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evidence-based recovery strategies in futsal

Nemčić

Calleja-González

2021

Kinesiology (Zagreb, Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Futsal (FT) can be defined as a multiple sprint sport with intermittent high-intensity activities. It could be considered one of the most demanding team sports due to the FT player’s heart rate mean of approximately 90%, work to rest ratio of 1:1 and activity changes every three seconds. Besides, unlimited number of substitutions, size of the pitch, a smaller ball and constant proximity of the opponent that puts extremely high demands on FT players are the main characteristics of the game. With studies reporting that participating in a FT match provokes muscle damages and inflammations, with a high injury incidence, it is of vital necessity to examine the most efficient methods providing fast recovery of FT players between practice sessions and matches played. Research studies focused on recovery methods in other team sports such as basketball, volleyball, and rugby, among others, reported benefits of passive recovery (massage, water therapy, stretching), active recovery and nutritional techniques. However, for the best of the authors’ knowledge, a limited number of recovery methods has been provided for the game of FT. The most effective recovery methods for FT players are only found to be photobiomodulation therapy and optimal sleeping regimen. Thereby, the main aim of the current narrative review is to present available scientific literature of recovery methods that may have positive effects on FT players.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evidence-based recovery strategies in futsal

Nemčić

Calleja-González

2021

Kinesiology (Zagreb, Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…8,15,21,32 As for agility, one study with only a single SMFR session reported effective results in the t test, 21 while two studies showed no influence on either dynamic reaction time or in the t test. 15,23 Controversial results were observed for multiple SMFR sessions with several studies reporting negative impact on agility recovery over a prolonged period 8,44,46 and one study demonstrating better recovery of the same. 6 It is important to highlight that the studies used different intervention protocols.…”

Section: Smfr and Physical Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Single and Multiple Sessions of Self-Myofascial Release: Systematic Review

Oliveira

Mota

Carvalho

et al. 2022

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self-myofascial release with a roller has been used as a tool to accelerate recovery. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate how one session or multiple sessions of self-myofascial release with a roller affect the recovery of an athlete´s performance. The research was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, BVS, Embase, SPORTDiscus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases using the terms: foam rolling, foam roller, and self-myofascial release combined with recovery, exercise, fatigue, and sport and acute effects, chronic effects and performance, resulting in 12,020 articles. After checking the inclusion criteria, 40 studies were selected and analyzed. It was concluded that multiple sessions of self-myofascial release with a roller are more effective in recovering lower limb power and speed performance than just one session. A single session is more effective for recovering strength performance than multiple sessions. Moreover, both single and multiple sessions showed similar results in the recovery of agility, pain, flexibility, blood lactate removal, and perception of recovery. Finally, multiple sessions between sets of resistance exercise seem to reduce performance, decreasing the number of repetitions and resistance to fatigue, while a single session did not produce a significant effect. Self-myofascial release with a roller demonstrates potential for speeding up the recovery process of athletes. Future studies should evaluate the effect of the regular use of self-myofascial release with a roller on performance recovery. Level of evidence II; Systematic review.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, foam rolling seems to improve muscle soreness and muscle function loss [10]. Similarly, this technique seems to increase anti-inflammatory proteins, reduce proteins that promote inflammation, favoring muscle recovery and better performance [11], and increases blood lactate clearance, and leads to regenerate psychological characteristics during short-term compacted tournaments [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Acute Comparative Effect of Foam Rolling and Static Stretching on Range of Motion in Rowers

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rowers’ anthropometric characteristics and flexibility are fundamental to increase stroke amplitude and optimize power transfer. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of foam rolling and static stretching on the range of motion over time. Eight university rowers (24.8 ± 3.4 yrs., height 182.3 ± 6.5 cm, body mass 79.3 ± 4.6 kg) participated in an alternating treatment design study with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. The sit and reach test was used to measure the range of motion. Both in the foam rolling and in the static stretching method, a pre-test (T0), a post-test (T1), and a post-15-min test (T2) were performed. A significant effect was observed on the range of motion over time (p < 0.001), but not for time x method interaction (p = 0.680). Significant differences were found between T0 and T1 with foam rolling and static stretching (p < 0.001, d = 0.4); p < 0.001, d = 0.6). The differences between T0 and T2 were also significant with both methods (p = 0.001, d = 0.4; p < 0.001, d = 0.4). However, no significant difference was observed between T1 and T2 (p = 1.000, d = 0.1; p = 0.089, d = 0.2). Foam roller and static stretching seem to be effective methods to improve the range of motion but there seems to be no differences between them.

show abstract

The effects of foam roll on perceptual and performance recovery during a futsal tournament

Cited by 11 publications

References 43 publications

Evidence-based recovery strategies in futsal

Evidence-based recovery strategies in futsal

Effect of Single and Multiple Sessions of Self-Myofascial Release: Systematic Review

Acute Comparative Effect of Foam Rolling and Static Stretching on Range of Motion in Rowers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About