1994
DOI: 10.1038/npp.1994.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Fluoxetine on the Polysomnogram of Depressed Outpatients: A Pilot Study

Abstract: The effects of fluoxetine (FLU) and its active metabolite, norfluoxetine (NFLU), on the polysomnogram (PSG) of nine depressed outpatients (eight with major depression; one with bipolar II, depressed phase disorder) were investigated by contrasting PSG values prior to treatment and during administration of FLU. The PSG changes were correlated with daily dose, cumulative dosage, single serum concentrations, and the total area under the serum concentration curve (AUC) of both FLU and NFLU.KEY WORDS: Fluoxetine; N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One important aspect of the REM density is that it is a marker of depression in drug-free subjects and independent of gender (Lauer et al, 1991). It is affected by SSRIs (Hendrickse et al, 1994;Armitage et al, 1995b) in depressed subjects, and by sleep deprivation in healthy controls (Murck et al, 1999) and depressed subjects , but not by tianeptine in depressed subjects, as presented before. A study using REM latency under medication-free condition as a predictor for the response with fluoxetine failed to do so (Heiligenstein et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…One important aspect of the REM density is that it is a marker of depression in drug-free subjects and independent of gender (Lauer et al, 1991). It is affected by SSRIs (Hendrickse et al, 1994;Armitage et al, 1995b) in depressed subjects, and by sleep deprivation in healthy controls (Murck et al, 1999) and depressed subjects , but not by tianeptine in depressed subjects, as presented before. A study using REM latency under medication-free condition as a predictor for the response with fluoxetine failed to do so (Heiligenstein et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Indeed, in several species and notably the rat (Pastel and Fernstrom, 1987;Ursin et al, 1989;Lelkes et al, 1994;Maudhuit et al, 1994;Neckelmann et al, 1996b), the hamster (Gao et al, 1992), and also in humans (Van Bemmel et al, 1993;Hendrickse et al, 1994), the most consistent action of SSRIs is a reduction of paradoxical sleep (PS), which is sometimes associated with an enhancement of wakefulness (W) and a secondary increase in slow wave sleep (SWS) (Maudhuit et al, 1994;Ursin, 2002). In the same manner, systemic treatment with selective agonists at 5-HT 1A and 5-HT 1B receptors induces an inhibition of PS and an enhancement of wakefulness, notably in rodents (Dzoljic et al, 1992;Tissier et al, 1993;Bjorvatn and Ursin, 1994;Monti et al, 1995;Bjorvatn et al, 1997;Boutrel et al, 1999Boutrel et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In normal controls , fluoxetine increases REM latency, decreases REM sleep, reduces total sleep time and efficiency, and increases wakefulness and Stage 1 sleep. However, it is generally devoid of any effect on slow wave sleep (von Bardeleben et al 1989;Saletu et al 1991;Hendrickse et al 1994;Nicholson and Pascoe 1988). In depressed patients , fluoxetine appears to prolong REM latency, reduce REM sleep, reduce REM density, and increase Stage 1 sleep (Hendrickse et al 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%