The effects of field inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi through rye donor plants on grapevine performance and soil properties

Nogales, Amaia; Rottier, Emilien; Campos, Catarina; Victorino, Gonçalo; Costa, J.M.; Coito, João L.; Pereira, H. Sofia; Viegas, Wanda; Lopes, Carlos M.

doi:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107369

Cited by 20 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 81 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Instead, it could generate both negative and positive impacts [10]. Inoculation can increase [36,37], reduce [38,39], or have neutral [32,38,[40][41][42][43][44] or mixed effects [7,45] on the abundance and composition of indigenous AMF colonizing the same roots.…”

Section: Successful Invasion Does Not Necessitate Negative Impacts On...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, designing a mycorrhizafriendly cropping system using a diverse rotational sequence, utilizing cover crops, and adopting no-till agriculture [57] and an agroecological approach, such as a donor crop, where the donor crop is intercropped with the target crop, could help harness the functional diversity of indigenous AMF communities [58]. Moreover, inoculation via donor crop is a more convenient and effective inoculation approach in large-field or woody crops where inoculation could be labor intensive or technically difficult [36]. However, donor crops must be carefully selected, as there could be asymmetry in the benefits gained from common mycorrhizal networks, in which the receiver plant's investment in these networks is greater than the gains [59].…”

Section: Adopting Practices That Promote the Richness And Diversity O...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does Commercial Inoculation Promote Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Invasion?

Basiru

Hijri

2022

Microorganisms

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interventions with commercial inoculants have the potential to reduce the environmental footprint of agriculture, but their indiscriminate deployment has raised questions on the unintended consequences of microbial invasion. In the absence of explicit empirical reports on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) invasion, we examine the present framework used to define AMF invasion and offer perspectives on the steps needed to avoid the negative impacts of AMF invasion. Although commercial AMF isolates are potential invaders, invasions do not always constitute negative impacts on native community diversity and functions. Instead, the fates of the invading and resident communities are determined by ecological processes such as selection, drift, dispersal, and speciation. Nevertheless, we recommend strategies that reduce overdependence on introduced inoculants, such as adoption management practices that promote the diversity and richness of indigenous AMF communities, and the development of native propagules as a supplement to commercial AMF in applicable areas. Policies and regulations that monitor inoculant value chains from production to application must be put in place to check inoculant quality and composition, as well as the transport of inoculants between geographically distant regions.

show abstract

Section: Successful Invasion Does Not Necessitate Negative Impacts On...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Adopting Practices That Promote the Richness And Diversity O...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Commercial Inoculation Promote Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Invasion?

Basiru

Hijri

2022

Microorganisms

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Inoculation of vineyard soil with AMF can be a convenient strategy for reestablishing land mycorrhizal potential, helping vines to better withstand heatwaves [227], and improving water-use efficiency [228].…”

Section: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (Amf)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Biostimulants in Viticulture: A Sustainable Approach against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

Cataldo

Fucile

Mattii

2022

Plants

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate change and disproportionate anthropogenic interventions, such as the excess of phytopharmaceutical products and continuous soil tillage, are jeopardizing viticulture by subjecting plants to continuous abiotic stress. One of the main physiological repercussions of abiotic stress is represented by the unbalanced redox homeostasis due to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ultimately leading to a state of oxidative stress (detrimental to grape quality). To these are added the direct and indirect damages caused by pathogens (biotic stresses). In light of this scenario, it is inevitable that sustainable techniques and sensitivity approaches for environmental and human health have to be applied in viticulture. Sustainable viticulture can only be made with the aid of sustainable products. Biostimulant (PB) applications (including resistance inducers or elicitors) in the vineyard have become interesting maneuvers for counteracting vine diseases and improving grape quality. These also represent a partial alternative to soil fertilization by improving nutrient absorption and avoiding its leaching into the groundwater. Their role as elicitors has important repercussions in the stimulation of the phenylpropanoid pathway by triggering the activation of several enzymes, such as polyphenol oxidase, lipoxygenase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, and peroxidase (with the accumulation of phenolic compounds). The present review paper summarizes the PBs’ implications in viticulture, gathering historical, functional, and applicative information. This work aims to highlight the innumerable beneficial effects on vines brought by these products. It also serves to spur the scientific community to a greater contribution in investigating the response mechanisms of the plant to positive inductions.

show abstract

“…The impact of mixed formulations of bio-enhancers belonging to two or more physiologically related/divergent groups has generally been excellent in promoting crop performance compared to single or mono culture applications ( Keller-Pearson et al, 2020 ; Dierks et al, 2021 ; Nogales et al, 2021 ). During composite application, the synergistic or additive effect of the interacting microbe is expected on growth, crop nutrition, and yield of crops.…”

Section: Psm-sorghum Interactions: Inoculation Effects On Growth Crop Nutrition and Grain Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sorghum-Phosphate Solubilizers Interactions: Crop Nutrition, Biotic Stress Alleviation, and Yield Optimization

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a highly productive, gluten-free cereal crop plant that can be used as an alternative energy resource, human food, and livestock feed or for biofuel-ethanol production. Phosphate fertilization is a common practice to optimize sorghum yield but because of high cost, environmental hazards, and soil fertility reduction, the use of chemical P fertilizer is discouraged. Due to this, the impetus to search for an inexpensive and eco-friendly microbiome as an alternative to chemical P biofertilizer has been increased. Microbial formulations, especially phosphate solubilizing microbiome (PSM) either alone or in synergism with other rhizobacteria, modify the soil nutrient pool and augment the growth, P nutrition, and yield of sorghum. The use of PSM in sorghum disease management reduces the dependence on pesticides employed to control the phytopathogens damage. The role of PSM in the sorghum cultivation system is, however, relatively unresearched. In this manuscript, the diversity and the strategies adopted by PSM to expedite sorghum yield are reviewed, including the nutritional importance of sorghum in human health and the mechanism of P solubilization by PSM. Also, the impact of solo or composite inoculations of biological enhancers (PSM) with nitrogen fixers or arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is explained. The approaches employed by PSM to control sorghum phytopathogens are highlighted. The simultaneous bio-enhancing and biocontrol activity of the PS microbiome provides better options for the replacement of chemical P fertilizers and pesticide application in sustainable sorghum production practices.

show abstract

The effects of field inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi through rye donor plants on grapevine performance and soil properties

Cited by 20 publications

References 81 publications

Does Commercial Inoculation Promote Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Invasion?

Does Commercial Inoculation Promote Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Invasion?

Biostimulants in Viticulture: A Sustainable Approach against Biotic and Abiotic Stresses

Sorghum-Phosphate Solubilizers Interactions: Crop Nutrition, Biotic Stress Alleviation, and Yield Optimization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About