2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of femtosecond laser-textured Ti-6Al-4V on wettability and cell response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
78
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
78
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell number and cell mean area of HUVECs adhered onto CoCr surfaces were statistically equal for all studied series including CTR. Thus, DLIP technique did not affect cell adhesion, confirming the published results of Raimbault et al on laser‐modified surfaces. The fact that DLIP technique did not modify the nanoroughness of the surface and, consequently, did not affect protein adsorption could explain the similar adhesion and spreading of HUVEC on the patterned surfaces compared to the plain ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cell number and cell mean area of HUVECs adhered onto CoCr surfaces were statistically equal for all studied series including CTR. Thus, DLIP technique did not affect cell adhesion, confirming the published results of Raimbault et al on laser‐modified surfaces. The fact that DLIP technique did not modify the nanoroughness of the surface and, consequently, did not affect protein adsorption could explain the similar adhesion and spreading of HUVEC on the patterned surfaces compared to the plain ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This effect was visually confirmed through the optical microscopy images, which showed that peaks blocked the water expansion after deposition, mainly when the contact angle was perpendicular to the patterned lines, resulting in oval drop geometry (Figure S2, Supporting Information). This anisotropic wettability on laser‐modified samples was already reported by other authors with Cu and Ti substrates, suggesting that DLIP topographical patterns induced, in general, an anisotropic wettability on metals which could influence protein adsorption and, indeed, cell spreading.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Whereas the apparent contact angle initially reveals a pronounced drop as compared to unstructured brass, it increases into the hydrophobic regime and saturates over several days. This temporal evolution has already been shown for several metallic surfaces after femtosecond-based laser structuring [17,[25][26][27][28] and is mainly described by a highly chemical reactive surface direct after laser treatment and a growing passive hydrophobic layer rich on carbon from the composition of CO 2 [29]. Both the initial drop and the subsequent increase reveal a strong dependence on pulse overlap and laser fluence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This indicates that the measured contact angles on the CrCoMo samples due to laser processing can be explained by the increase of the ratio between the real surface area and the projected area σ and a reduction of the wetted area due to LIPSS [40,41]. Nonetheless, the contact angles are highly dependent on the formation of additional oxide layers.…”
Section: Wetting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 92%