2017
DOI: 10.1123/jsep.2015-0326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Feedback Valence and Style on Need Satisfaction, Self-Talk, and Perseverance Among Tennis Players: An Experimental Study

Abstract: Grounded in self-determination theory, this experimental study examined whether the valence (i.e., positive vs. negative) and style (i.e., autonomy-supportive vs. controlling) of normative feedback impact the self-talk, motivational experiences (i.e., psychological need satisfaction and enjoyment), and behavioral functioning (i.e., perseverance and performance) of tennis players (N = 120; M = 24.50 ± 9.86 years). Positive feedback and an autonomy-supportive style positively influenced players' enjoyment and pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
58
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
58
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of Carpentier and Mageau revealed that athletes’ outcomes (ie, well‐being, self‐esteem, need satisfaction, and performance) are better predicted by feedback quality, compared to the quantity of feedback. More recently, De Muynck et al emphasized the impact of both feedback's valence (ie, positive or negative) and its style (ie, autonomy‐supportive or controlling) on players’ need satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Carpentier and Mageau revealed that athletes’ outcomes (ie, well‐being, self‐esteem, need satisfaction, and performance) are better predicted by feedback quality, compared to the quantity of feedback. More recently, De Muynck et al emphasized the impact of both feedback's valence (ie, positive or negative) and its style (ie, autonomy‐supportive or controlling) on players’ need satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multi‐method measure is therefore considered to be a more valid measure of self‐talk, as procedure‐specific biases are filtered out of the self‐talk indicator. A multi‐method measure is also beneficial when interested in the possible mediating role of self‐talk because; in doing so, self‐talk is (at least partly) measured in between measurements of independent and dependent variables …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the current study made use of a ball machine, predominantly for reasons of standardization with regard to the manipulation that is reported elsewhere . This might reduce the ecological validity of the current study, as no human opponent was present on the court.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations