2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2012.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of Federal funds rate surprises on S&P 500 volatility and volatility risk premium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
31
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regressions, similar to those used in Chulia, Martens and van Dijk, [30] and Gospodinov and Jamali [31], are employed. Regressing dummy variables on the first differences of liquidity is employed here to examine the effect of news on liquidity: …”
Section: Impact Of News Releasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regressions, similar to those used in Chulia, Martens and van Dijk, [30] and Gospodinov and Jamali [31], are employed. Regressing dummy variables on the first differences of liquidity is employed here to examine the effect of news on liquidity: …”
Section: Impact Of News Releasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choudhry (2010) investigated the daily data of the Dow Jones index from January 1939 to December 1945 and found that the majority of the wartime events labelled important by historians did result in structural breaks in both price movement and stock return volatility. Gospodinov and Jamali (2012) examined the effects of expected and surprise components in Federal funds target rate changes on realized and implied volatility of the S&P 500, and they found that surprise changes in the target rate significantly increased volatility. Kaeck and Alexander (2012) applied Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to the time series data on the S&P 500 index returns to estimate affine and non-affine stochastic volatility models where jumps were allowed; they concluded that the inclusion of jumps was less important than allowing for non-affine dynamics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vähämaa and Äijö (2011) further analyze the relation under different economic cycles and note that the relation between FOMC announcements and the VIX is stronger during expantionary periods. Gospodinov and Jamali (2012), using daily data, examine the relation between realized and implied volatility on the S&P 500 index and FOMC announcements and find that the surprise in these announcements has a positive effect on both realized and implied volatility.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nikkinen and Sahlström, 2004) and particularly the announcement after the FOMC releases (see e.g. Chen and Clements, 2007;Vähämaa and Äijö, 2011;and Gospodinov and Jamali, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%