Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2578153.2578169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of fast disparity adjustment in gaze-controlled stereoscopic applications

Abstract: With the emergence of affordable 3D displays, stereoscopy is becoming a commodity. However, often users report discomfort even after brief exposures to stereo content. One of the main reasons is the conflict between vergence and accommodation that is caused by 3D displays. We investigate dynamic adjustment of stereo parameters in a scene using gaze data in order to reduce discomfort. In a user study, we measured stereo fusion times after abrupt manipulation of disparities using gaze data. We found that gaze-co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we compared the depth impression and the temporal stability of our gaze-contingent disparity retargeting (Sec. 8.1) to three potential alternatives: first, a traditional static mapping which does not adapt to the gaze location in any way; second, an immediate shift of depth which brings the depth in the gaze location to the screen without temporal considerations (similar to [Bernhard et al 2014]); and finally, the method of Hanhart and Ebrahimi [2014] as discussed in Sec. 3.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, we compared the depth impression and the temporal stability of our gaze-contingent disparity retargeting (Sec. 8.1) to three potential alternatives: first, a traditional static mapping which does not adapt to the gaze location in any way; second, an immediate shift of depth which brings the depth in the gaze location to the screen without temporal considerations (similar to [Bernhard et al 2014]); and finally, the method of Hanhart and Ebrahimi [2014] as discussed in Sec. 3.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fisker et al [2013] investigate the gaze-driven disparity adjustment towards the screen plane in an informal experiment and report promising results in terms of visual comfort and perceived depth. Bernhard et al [2014] perform a full-scale experiment where an abrupt disparity adjustment to the screen plane is compared to the static disparity case in terms of the vergence time. In this case, shorter timings are desirable for reducing the viewing fatigue.…”
Section: Gaze-driven Disparity Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the DOF correction will limit stereofusion to regions of the scene with admissible disparities and could tamper this potential issue. A good strategy to deal with this problem would be to smooth the speed at which the vergence alignment and DOF correction are applied [25]. This aspect of the corrective algorithm needs to be studied in detail with subjective trials, which is an interesting venue for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al in [24] as visual discomfort palliative. The effect of affecting the image disparity as a mean to emulate vergence and control the screen parallax over the ROI has been presented in [25] by Bernhard et al who studied the time lapses necessary to produce stereofusion.…”
Section: Background Of the Ideamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He suggested to solve the problem of transitions by cross-fading the horizontal image translation to zero at the cut. Bernhard et al [2014] showed how binocular fusion times can be reduced by means of active manipulation of the convergence plane. The object of interest is brought back to the zero-disparity plane once the change in gaze has been detected, but before the vergence adaptation is complete.…”
Section: S3d Content Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%