2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of farm management practices on liver fluke prevalence and the current internal parasite control measures employed on Irish dairy farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
4
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
13
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are similar to the prevalence (78%) among Irish dairy farms (Selemetas et al, 2015c), but higher than the prevalence of 65% found in culled cows during autumn and summer (Murphy et al, 2006), which could be the result of different climatic and environmental conditions or different sampling time period, as the peak of the annual cycle of fasciolosis is expected in late autumn due to pasture contamination at the end of summer (Salimi-Bejestani et al, 2005a). In general, the high prevalence observed in Irish dairy farms can be associated with the combination of temperate climate and high level of grass-based diet during grazing period that can raise the exposure to parasites (O'Farrell et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results of this study are similar to the prevalence (78%) among Irish dairy farms (Selemetas et al, 2015c), but higher than the prevalence of 65% found in culled cows during autumn and summer (Murphy et al, 2006), which could be the result of different climatic and environmental conditions or different sampling time period, as the peak of the annual cycle of fasciolosis is expected in late autumn due to pasture contamination at the end of summer (Salimi-Bejestani et al, 2005a). In general, the high prevalence observed in Irish dairy farms can be associated with the combination of temperate climate and high level of grass-based diet during grazing period that can raise the exposure to parasites (O'Farrell et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the present study, the overall F. hepatica seroprevalence was 28.7% (454/1,584), which was lower than that reported in yaks in Xinghai tested by autopsy method [9,10], cattle in Switzerland [14], Poland [14], Australia [15], Ireland [16], and Vietnam [17] examined by ELISA, but higher than that of cattle in Spain [5] and Denmark [18], cow in Germany [19] tested by ELISA. It has been demonstrated that F. hepatica infection mainly occurs in cattle [20] and goats [20], otherwise, F. gigantica usually infect water buffaloes.…”
contrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Het aantal geïnfecteerde melkveebedrijven lijkt in andere landen toe te nemen (Fairweather, 2011;Fitzpatrick, 2013;KnubbenSchweizer & Torgerson, 2015;Olsen et al, 2015;Selemetas et al, 2015b). De prevalentie van leverbot in Nederland wordt niet gemonitord (buiten de gegevens die zijn verkregen van bedrijven die deelnamen aan GD tankmelkonderzoek) waardoor onbekend is of in Nederland eveneens sprake is van een toename in leverbot.…”
Section: Figuur 3 Leverbotslakjes (Galba Truncatula)unclassified
“…Het verschil tussen deze naburige bedrijven zal minder bepaald worden door de aan-of afwezigheid van een geschikte habitat voor de leverbotslak (Bennema et al, 2009;Olsen et al, 2015). Verschillen zullen waarschijnlijk bepaald worden door het toegepaste management, bijvoorbeeld de manier van weidegang en aankoop van (besmette) dieren (Olsen et al, 2015;Selemetas et al, 2015b). Verschillen tussen groepen in het aandeel besmette dieren binnen een besmet bedrijf worden vooral veroorzaakt door verschil in blootstelling van de verschillende diercategorieën aan leverbot (Byrne et al, 2016).…”
Section: Inzet Leverbotinstrument Op Bedrijvenunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation