2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10560-016-0468-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Family Structure on Consumption and Exercise Patterns for Adolescent Youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… Note: BMI: body mass index; ECLS-K: Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort; NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; LSAC: Longitudinal Study of Australian Children; IDEFICS: Identification and Prevention of Dietary-and Lifestyle-Induced Health Effects in Children and Infants; ECLS-B: Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth Cohort; ECLS-K: Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Kindergarten Cohort. a Sisson et al (2014) measured and found differences in obesogenic behaviors and did not measure BMI. Outcomes: Children from single-mother homes had higher odds of bedroom television and higher odds of infrequent family meals (odds ratio: 1.49, 1.28). b Yelick’s (2017) primary outcome was to measure eating and exercise patterns. Outcomes: Compared to youth from single parent families, youth from two-parent families had healthy consumption pattern and higher levels of exercise patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Note: BMI: body mass index; ECLS-K: Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort; NHANES: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; LSAC: Longitudinal Study of Australian Children; IDEFICS: Identification and Prevention of Dietary-and Lifestyle-Induced Health Effects in Children and Infants; ECLS-B: Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth Cohort; ECLS-K: Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Kindergarten Cohort. a Sisson et al (2014) measured and found differences in obesogenic behaviors and did not measure BMI. Outcomes: Children from single-mother homes had higher odds of bedroom television and higher odds of infrequent family meals (odds ratio: 1.49, 1.28). b Yelick’s (2017) primary outcome was to measure eating and exercise patterns. Outcomes: Compared to youth from single parent families, youth from two-parent families had healthy consumption pattern and higher levels of exercise patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… b Yelick’s (2017) primary outcome was to measure eating and exercise patterns. Outcomes: Compared to youth from single parent families, youth from two-parent families had healthy consumption pattern and higher levels of exercise patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for the rise of obesity in children and adolescents are diverse and include poor food choices, physical inactivity, sedentary lifestyle, peer groups, family structure and socio-economic status (SES) of the parents (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) . Furthermore, some literature suggests that nutrition knowledge in children and young adolescents may have an impact on dietary habits (30) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have found that the mother is the most important relative promoting child health and that children living without their mother were at significantly higher risk of mortality and other negative outcomes, at least in part because they receive fewer resources and less care [42,44]. Studies have shown that step-mothers do not substitute for mothers [15,43], and our findings corroborate these reports, but paradoxically indicate that living with a step-parent is not associated with worse outcomes in the case of obesity. One concern would be whether the absence of obesity is actually a negative outcome, in that it could indicate underweight, but we did not find this to be the case, as children living in step-families were not more often underweight than children living with both biological parents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third aspect of household structure, also understudied with respect to obesity, is the relatedness of co-residing parents to the child. Children living with stepparents are disadvantaged compared with children living with two biological parents [15,4143]. In the U.S., step-parents have tended to invest less in children than do biological parents: households that include stepchildren spend less on food: spending varies with the relatedness between mother and child, with less spent on adoptive than biological children, less on stepchildren than on adoptive children, and less on foster children than on stepchildren; children living with stepmothers are also less likely to have routine doctor and dentist visits, to have a health care provider, to wear seatbelts, and to live in a non-smoking home [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%