2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of exposure to environmentally relevant PFAS concentrations for aquatic organisms at different consumer trophic levels: Systematic review and meta-analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(118 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PFAS are associated with adverse human health effects, and fish consumption has been associated with higher PFAS concentrations in humans . Some states have issued advisories to limit fish consumption, and piscivorous wildlife are also subject to adverse effects from PFAS. , Specific advisories exist for some states, including New York State in certain water bodies, such as Beaverdam Lake, Washington Lake, and Lockwood Basin, where advisories are “don’t eat” for all fish…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…PFAS are associated with adverse human health effects, and fish consumption has been associated with higher PFAS concentrations in humans . Some states have issued advisories to limit fish consumption, and piscivorous wildlife are also subject to adverse effects from PFAS. , Specific advisories exist for some states, including New York State in certain water bodies, such as Beaverdam Lake, Washington Lake, and Lockwood Basin, where advisories are “don’t eat” for all fish…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Police dogs exposed to firefighting foams and laboratory beagles exposed to dietary PFAS showed dose-dependent alterations in amylase, cholesterol, and several indicators of blood chemistry at ΣPFAS levels averaging 3.6 ng/ml (maximum 16.6 ng/ml) (You et al, 2022). Aquatic secondary consumers, mainly fish, were adversely affected by serum PFAS as low as 13.5 ng/mL (Banyoi et al, 2022). Immunotoxicity resulted from very low daily doses of 6:2 FTS in white-footed mice (Bohannon et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wildlife, the evidence for negative health effects of PFAS is largely preliminary, but a growing list of studies have reported specific detrimental effects and declines in overall condition (D’Hollander et al, 2014; Costantini et al, 2019; Banyoi et al, 2022; Guillette et al, 2022; Jouanneau et al, 2022; Sebastiano et al, 2023). Toxicity estimates based on lab experiments are similar for rodents and birds; for both vertebrate classes, perfluoroalkane sulfonic acids (PFSAs) tend to be more toxic than perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) at similar carbon-chain lengths, and 8-carbon compounds tend to be more toxic than shorter molecules (Ankley et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that the concentrations at which PFAS show lethal effects in laboratory toxicity tests are unrealistically high and therefore not very environmentally relevant (Banyoi et al, 2022; Sinclair et al, 2020). However, considering the persistency of PFAS, organisms in PFAS‐contaminated areas may be chronically exposed to substantially lower concentrations, potentially causing a wide range of more subtle sublethal effects (ITRC, 2022; Sinclair et al, 2020).…”
Section: Ecotoxicity Of Pfasmentioning
confidence: 99%