1992
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners

Abstract: The effects of variations in response categories, subjects' perception of natural speech, and stimulus range on the identification of American English /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese were investigated. Three experiments using a synthesized /rait/-/lait/ series showed that all these variables affected identification and discrimination performance by Japanese subjects. Furthermore, some of the perceptual characteristics of /r/ and /l/ for Japanese listeners were clarified: (1) Japanese listeners ident… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-s-Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein contrast was selected as a test case for assessing novel approaches to non-native speech contrast training because of its extreme difficulty for Japanese speakers (Goto, 1971;MacKain, Best, & Strange, 1981;Miyawaki et aI., 1975;Mochizuki, 1981;Sheldon & Strange, 1982;Yamada & Tohkura, 1992), and because it had been shown in previous studies to be resistant to modification after discrimination training with synthetic consonant-vowel stimuli (see Strange & Dittmann, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-s-Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein contrast was selected as a test case for assessing novel approaches to non-native speech contrast training because of its extreme difficulty for Japanese speakers (Goto, 1971;MacKain, Best, & Strange, 1981;Miyawaki et aI., 1975;Mochizuki, 1981;Sheldon & Strange, 1982;Yamada & Tohkura, 1992), and because it had been shown in previous studies to be resistant to modification after discrimination training with synthetic consonant-vowel stimuli (see Strange & Dittmann, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that talkers may give differential emphasis to the multiple cues to /r/ and /l/ (although acoustic correlates to the perceptual differences have not been previously reported), and that Japanese listeners have not experienced a sufficient sampling of the range of cues to /r/ and /l/ that occur across different talkers to be able to normalize for this kind of variability. Considering talker differences in cues as adding to the range of cues suggests a connection to previous work by Yamada and Tohkura [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In the experiments, we considered the question of whether Japanese listeners are able to adapt to talker-specific differences in cues to /r/ and /l/, or if added variability due to talker differences instead influences sessionspecific criteria, as did the "range" manipulations in [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For SC interactions, the illustrious English contrast [i]: [1], in which both phones correspond nearly equally well/poorly to the single Japanese /t/ category, has been examined by copious studies (to name only a few recent examples, Aoyama, Flege, Guion, Akahane -Yamada, & Yamada, 2004;Best & Strange, 1992;Logan, Lively, & Pisoni, 1991;McCandliss, Fiez, Protopapas, Conway, & McClelland, 2002;Yamada & Tohkura, 1992). Somewhat less famously, the CG pattern can be typified by the French and German [u]: [y] contrast with English /u/ (see, e.g., Flege & Hillenbrand, 1984;Gottfried, 1984;Polka, 1995;Rochet, 1995), in which the phone [u] manifests much greater (although not perfect) category goodness to English /u/ over the phonetically similar [y].…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%