Abstract:The purpose of this experiment was to test how ethnic group membership of both the bullies and the victims influence the way that observers attribute human characteristics to bullies. Ethnic group membership was manipulated in terms of bullies' and victims' ethnicity (ingroup-majority group versus outgroup-minority group). Furthermore, we examined the mediating role of empathic concern towards the victim and perspective taking of the bully in the relation between ethnic group membership of bullies and victims … Show more
“…The poor internal consistency of the measure in comparison to past research with other groups as the outgroup (e.g. Fousiani et al, 2018) could relate to participants in this study showing greater variation across each trait item rating particularly for autistic people. Kteily et al (2015) compared both subtle measures (such as that used in this study) and blatant measures (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Likewise, internal consistency was marginally acceptable for human uniqueness traits for ratings of non-autistic people ( ω = 0.63) and poorer for ratings of autistic people ( ω = 0.58). Previous studies have reported good internal consistency for human uniqueness ( ω = 0.85) and human nature traits ( ω = 0.74; Fousiani et al, 2018) although the measure may have low test–retest reliability (Kteily et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have reported good internal consistency for human uniqueness (.85) and human nature traits (.74;Fousiani, Michaelides & Dimitropoulou, 2018) although the measure may have low test-retest reliability (Kteily et al, 2015).…”
Research suggests that while individuals may self-report positive attitudes towards autism, dehumanising attitudes (seeing another as less than human) may still prevail. This study investigated knowledge, openness and dehumanising attitudes of non-autistic people towards autistic people. A total of 361 participants completed a survey measuring autism openness, knowledge and experience, along with a measure of dehumanisation. Results showed that knowledge of autism was comparable to past research and females were more open towards autism. Findings also indicated evidence for dehumanisation, with a particular denial of ‘human uniqueness’ traits. Furthermore, dehumanisation was related to openness towards autism. These findings have implications for targeting attitudes to reduce stigma associated with autism.
“…The poor internal consistency of the measure in comparison to past research with other groups as the outgroup (e.g. Fousiani et al, 2018) could relate to participants in this study showing greater variation across each trait item rating particularly for autistic people. Kteily et al (2015) compared both subtle measures (such as that used in this study) and blatant measures (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Likewise, internal consistency was marginally acceptable for human uniqueness traits for ratings of non-autistic people ( ω = 0.63) and poorer for ratings of autistic people ( ω = 0.58). Previous studies have reported good internal consistency for human uniqueness ( ω = 0.85) and human nature traits ( ω = 0.74; Fousiani et al, 2018) although the measure may have low test–retest reliability (Kteily et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have reported good internal consistency for human uniqueness (.85) and human nature traits (.74;Fousiani, Michaelides & Dimitropoulou, 2018) although the measure may have low test-retest reliability (Kteily et al, 2015).…”
Research suggests that while individuals may self-report positive attitudes towards autism, dehumanising attitudes (seeing another as less than human) may still prevail. This study investigated knowledge, openness and dehumanising attitudes of non-autistic people towards autistic people. A total of 361 participants completed a survey measuring autism openness, knowledge and experience, along with a measure of dehumanisation. Results showed that knowledge of autism was comparable to past research and females were more open towards autism. Findings also indicated evidence for dehumanisation, with a particular denial of ‘human uniqueness’ traits. Furthermore, dehumanisation was related to openness towards autism. These findings have implications for targeting attitudes to reduce stigma associated with autism.
“…In their systematic review of 40 empathy studies, van Noorden et al ( 2014) cited a range of small-to-moderate effect sizes between dispositional PT and bullying experiences that were age group-specific (e.g., for young adolescents aged 11 to 13). Sex consistently determined both empathy dimensions and experiences in bullying processes separately at low levels (van Noorden et al, 2014) as well as ethnical background (Fousiani et al, 2019;Strohmeier et al, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical Basics Of Belief In a Just Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research uncovered, as mentioned in Sect. 5, predictive effects of age (van Noorden et al, 2014), gender, ethnical background (Fousiani et al, 2019), and electronic device (Bjereld et al, 2017) that the adolescents used to participate in the online survey were included. We therefore included these variables in our single SEM.…”
Bullying is a serious problem around the world, especially among adolescents. Evidence exists that low levels of social perspective-taking as well as belief in a just world played an important role in bullying. Both dispositions function as psychological resources that may help students behave appropriately in social life. Previous research identified distinct bullying roles such as perpetrator, victim, assistant, reinforcer, defender, and bystander experiences. Although this participant-role approach has been extensively investigated in the last years, a simultaneous examination of students’ perspective-taking and belief in a just world in relation to their experiences in these roles is still missing. This study’s objective was to examine a differential approach of school students’ visuospatial and dispositional social perspective-taking, emotional concern, and personal belief in a just world in relation to their experiences in bullying roles. We tested these relations in a sample of n = 1309 adolescents (50.6% female, Mage = 13.73, SDage = 0.85) from 38 schools in Germany. The results from a latent structural-equation model suggested that experiences as a perpetrator, assistant, reinforcer but also as defender related to low visuospatial social perspective-taking. Emotional concern was positively related to defender experiences. Personal belief in a just world was negatively associated with experiences as a perpetrator and a victim. The results underline the importance of disentangling concurrent contributions of perspective-taking and belief in a just world related to the bullying roles. We conclude that adolescents’ visuospatial social perspective taking seems to be a further mental resource against antisocial behavior in bullying.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.