1996
DOI: 10.1080/09064719609410947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Drought and Nitrogen on Light Interception, Growth and Yield of Winter Oilseed Rape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
23
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
23
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering only the two higher doses of applied N, 80 to 160kg ha -1 (Figure 2b), the extinction coefficient for PAR was 0.46, somewhat higher than the average coefficient for all doses of N together (Figure 2a). Even so, this value is slightly lower than that reported by ANDERSEN et al (1996) andFRAY et al (1996) for conventional winter canola genotypes, but greater than the coefficient reported by FRAY et al (1996) for a genotype with more upright siliques. This shows that, for spring canola cultivated in conditions of southern Brazil, there is more interception of PAR by reproductive structures in non-limiting levels of available nitrogen, due to a higher production of reproductive structures, than for low levels of nitrogen.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When considering only the two higher doses of applied N, 80 to 160kg ha -1 (Figure 2b), the extinction coefficient for PAR was 0.46, somewhat higher than the average coefficient for all doses of N together (Figure 2a). Even so, this value is slightly lower than that reported by ANDERSEN et al (1996) andFRAY et al (1996) for conventional winter canola genotypes, but greater than the coefficient reported by FRAY et al (1996) for a genotype with more upright siliques. This shows that, for spring canola cultivated in conditions of southern Brazil, there is more interception of PAR by reproductive structures in non-limiting levels of available nitrogen, due to a higher production of reproductive structures, than for low levels of nitrogen.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…This value is 12% lower than that reported in winter canola by ANDERSEN et al (1996) andFRAY et al (1996), also for the reproductive structures, which was 0.5. However, it is 9% higher than that reported by FRAY et al (1996) for winter canola with more upright siliques.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decrease of 1000 seed weight is due to decline of water and nutrients absorption by plant and then decrease of assimilation and assimilates transport to seed. Effect drought stress on winter canola has been studied by Andersen et al (1996); it observed that, pod number in plant, seed number in pods and seed yield were significantly decreased by drought stress while 1000 seed weight was decreased by drought stress at flowering seed filling stages. Oil percentage was decreased by drought stress it seems that, reduces of photosynthesis and assimilates remobilization reasons decrease of oil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crop specific k PAR value for maize was calculated from the GAI data and the measured fraction of non-intercepted diffuse radiation (DIFN data) measured by the LAI-2000 device, according to [36]. For wheat, k PAR was taken from [37], for mustard a k PAR value of oilseed rape was taken from [38] assuming that it is also valid for mustard, for Italian ryegrass a value from [39] and for perennial ryegrass from [39] and [40] were taken ( Table 2).…”
Section: Crop Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%