1956
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(56)90057-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of digitoxin upon the twelve lead electrocardiogram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1958
1958
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Criteria for inclusion were: (1) no change in digoxin dosage for at least 7 days; (2) serum digoxin concentration measurement prior to the intake of the regular digitalis dose; (3) registration of an electrocardiogram within 6 h of the serum digoxin concentration measurement; (4) absence of conditions whose effects on the electrocardiogram could potentially mask those of digitalis (Table I): the serum potassium level (normal range 3.5-5.0 mmol/l) and the serum calcium level (normal range 2.2-2.7 mmol/l) were measured in every patient. Exclusion criteria for patients with ischemic heart disease were unstable angina, previous myocardial infaiction, and previous heart surgery; however, ischemic heart disease was not actively looked for and several patients may have had some degree of (clinically stable) ischemic heart disease.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria for inclusion were: (1) no change in digoxin dosage for at least 7 days; (2) serum digoxin concentration measurement prior to the intake of the regular digitalis dose; (3) registration of an electrocardiogram within 6 h of the serum digoxin concentration measurement; (4) absence of conditions whose effects on the electrocardiogram could potentially mask those of digitalis (Table I): the serum potassium level (normal range 3.5-5.0 mmol/l) and the serum calcium level (normal range 2.2-2.7 mmol/l) were measured in every patient. Exclusion criteria for patients with ischemic heart disease were unstable angina, previous myocardial infaiction, and previous heart surgery; however, ischemic heart disease was not actively looked for and several patients may have had some degree of (clinically stable) ischemic heart disease.…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A left aortic arch was seen to originate from the left ventricle, and a tiny pulmonary artery appeared to communicate with the right ventricle. The [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] showed an unchanged sinus rate and P-R interval. The precordial leads revealed prominent R waves with an upright T wave in the right precordial leads and predominant S waves in the left, suggesting right ventricular hypertrophy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is understandable in view of the nature of electrocardiographic alterations, of which the causes are legion. For example, 3 of the replies specifically referred to the absence of digitalis administration, since this form of therapy is a frequent source of confusion (10).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%