The effects of different photon beam energies in stereotactic radiosurgery with cones

Abstract

BackgroundStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) relies on small fields to ablate lesions. Currently, linac based treatment is delivered via circular cones using a 6 MV beam. There is interest in both lower energy photon beams, which can offer steeper dose fall off as well as higher energy photon beams, which have higher dose rates, thus reducing radiation delivery times. Of interest in this study is the 2.5 MV beam developed for imaging applications and both the 6 and 10 MV flattening‐filter‐free (FFF) beams, which can achieve dose rates up to 2400 cGy/min.PurposeThis study aims to assess the benefit and feasibility among different energy beams ranging from 2.5 to 10 MV beams by evaluating the dosimetric effects of each beam and comparing the dose to organs‐at‐risk (OARs) for two separate patient plans. One based on a typical real patient tremor utilizing a 4 mm cone and the other a typical brain metastasis delivered with a 10 mm cone.MethodsThe Monte Carlo codes BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc were used to generate beams of 2.5 MV, 6 MV‐FFF, 6 MV‐SRS, 6 MV, 10 MV‐FFF, and 10 MV from a Varian TrueBeam except 6 MV‐SRS, which is taken from a Varian TX model linear accelerator. Each beam's energy spectrum, mean energy, %dd curve, and dose profile were obtained by analyzing the simulated beams. Calculated patient dose distributions were compared among six different energy beam configurations based on a realistic treatment plan for thalamotomy and a conventional brain metastasis plan. Dose to OARs were evaluated using dose–volume histograms for the same target dose coverage.ResultsThe mean energies of photons within the primary beam projected area were insensitive to cone sizes and the values of percentage depth–dose curves (%dd) at d = 5 cm and SSD = 95 cm for a 4 mm (10 mm) cone ranges from 62.6 (64.4) to 82.2 (85.7) for beam energy ranging from 2.5 to 10 MV beams, respectively. Doses to OARs were evaluated among these beams based on real treatment plans delivering 15 000 and 2200 cGy to the target with a 4 and 10 mm cone, respectively. The maximum doses to the brainstem, which is 10 mm away from the isocenter, was found to be 434 (300), 632 (352), 691 (362), 733 (375), 822 (403), and 975 (441) cGy for 2.5 MV, 6 MV‐FFF, 6 MV‐SRS, 6 MV, 10 MV‐FFF, and 10 MV beams delivering 15 000 (2200) cGy target dose, respectively.ConclusionUsing the 6 MV‐SRS as reference, changes of the maximum dose (691 cGy) to the brain stem are −37%, −9%, +6%, +19%, and 41% for 2.5 MV, 6 MV‐FFF, 6 MV, 10 MV‐FFF, and 10 MV beams, respectively, based on the thalamotomy plan, where the “‐” or “+” signs indicate the percentage decrease or increase. Changes of the maximum dose (362 cGy) to brain stem, based on the brain metastasis plan are much less for respective beam energies. The sum of 21 arcs beam‐on time was 39 min on our 6 MV‐SRS beam with 1000 cGy/min for thalamotomy. The beam‐on time can be reduced to 16 min with 10 MV‐FFF.