2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of different cement dosages, slumps, and pumice aggregate ratios on the thermal conductivity and density of concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
59
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the thermal conductivity was up to 46% lower than that of similar plain cement paste samples. This can be attributed to the fact that the pumice (a highly porous volcanic rock) has a lower thermal conductivity than cement paste [35]. It has also been reported that the effective thermal conductivity of cement mortar increased with increasing free moisture content φ w [28,29,34,36].…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Of Cementitious Compositesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that the thermal conductivity was up to 46% lower than that of similar plain cement paste samples. This can be attributed to the fact that the pumice (a highly porous volcanic rock) has a lower thermal conductivity than cement paste [35]. It has also been reported that the effective thermal conductivity of cement mortar increased with increasing free moisture content φ w [28,29,34,36].…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Of Cementitious Compositesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This can also be attributed to the difference in thermal conductivity between air and water filling up the pores [34]. Moreover, the type and volume fraction of aggregates present in cement mortar composites can alter their effective thermal conductivity [26,34,35]. Table 2.2 summarizes the experimental studies reporting the thermal conductivity of cement mortar with different types and amount of aggregate inclusions as well as w/c ratio, age, and free moisture content φ w [26,29,34].…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Of Cementitious Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this factor reflects the test results of thermal conductivity coefficient of clay brick wall systems. In an investigation by Uysal et al [24], it was found that the density of concrete decreased with an increase in pumice aggregate ratios (at a constant slump and cement content) and the reduction in the density because of pumice aggregate replacement was 12 %, 22 %, 34 %, and 42 % for 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 %, respectively. As a result of the reduction in density, the effect of pumice aggregate that replaced normal aggregates at 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 % by volume on thermal conductivity was about 8 %, 20 %, 28 %, and 47 %, respectively.…”
Section: Fig 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LWAC has been known offers various advantages due to its lower density [1], higher ratio of strength/weight [2], less conductivity thermal [3,4], better durability properties [5,6], fire resistance [7] and etc. The use of lightweight concrete reduce the size of columns, beams, wall and foundation which as well reducing the dead load and minimizing the damages of structures due to earthquake [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%